Volume 9, Issue 1 (Jan-Mar 2020)
JCHR 2020, 9(1): 54-65 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mirzaei N, Kamelnia H, Islami S G, Kamyabi S, Assadi S N. The Impact of Indoor Environmental Quality of Green Buildings on Occupants' Health and Satisfaction: A systematic review. JCHR 2020; 9 (1) :54-65
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-540-en.html
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-540-en.html
Neda Mirzaei1 
, Hamed Kamelnia * 2, Seyed Gholamreza Islami3 , Saeid Kamyabi4 , Seyedeh Negar Assadi5
, Hamed Kamelnia * 2, Seyed Gholamreza Islami3 , Saeid Kamyabi4 , Seyedeh Negar Assadi5
1- Department of Architecture, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
2- Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran ,kamelnia@um.ac.ir
3- Faculty of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran ,Tehran, Iran
4- Tourism Research Center (Central Southern Alborz Hillside), Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
5- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran ,
3- Faculty of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran ,Tehran, Iran
4- Tourism Research Center (Central Southern Alborz Hillside), Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
5- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract: (3791 Views)
Introduction: The main benefits of green buildings for energy and water conservation have been investigated and well recognized in previous studies. However, indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and human health benefits of green buildings have not been examined comprehensively. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review over the current status of green and non- green buildings on their occupants’ health and satisfaction.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted throughout the following databases: Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Springer. We reviewed 690 articles that examined the relationship between buildings and health. In total, after excluding the irrelevant titles and non-English articles, 40 papers were included in the final analysis. Articles that evaluated IEQ factors and occupants’ health through surveys from 2005 to 2018 years were selected for investigation.
Results: The most important result of this study was identification of important factors in IEQ, including building design, aesthetics, and ergonomics, which have been less evaluated in previous research. Contrary to our assumption, the results of several studies indicated a further decline in IEQ parameters in buildings with Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED, USA) and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM, Europe) certification. However, performance improvements were reported in green buildings located in Asia (especially Singapore and Taiwan).
Conclusion: According to this systematic review, we cannot claim that occupants of the green buildings enjoy higher IEQ, satisfaction, or health, compared with the occupants of non-green buildings.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted throughout the following databases: Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Springer. We reviewed 690 articles that examined the relationship between buildings and health. In total, after excluding the irrelevant titles and non-English articles, 40 papers were included in the final analysis. Articles that evaluated IEQ factors and occupants’ health through surveys from 2005 to 2018 years were selected for investigation.
Results: The most important result of this study was identification of important factors in IEQ, including building design, aesthetics, and ergonomics, which have been less evaluated in previous research. Contrary to our assumption, the results of several studies indicated a further decline in IEQ parameters in buildings with Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED, USA) and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM, Europe) certification. However, performance improvements were reported in green buildings located in Asia (especially Singapore and Taiwan).
Conclusion: According to this systematic review, we cannot claim that occupants of the green buildings enjoy higher IEQ, satisfaction, or health, compared with the occupants of non-green buildings.
Review: Review |
Subject:
Environmental Health
Received: 2019/06/29 | Accepted: 2020/04/5 | Published: 2020/03/29
Received: 2019/06/29 | Accepted: 2020/04/5 | Published: 2020/03/29
References
1. Allen J, MacNaughton P, Laurent J, et al. Green buildings and health. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2015; 2(3):250-258. [DOI:10.1007/s40572-015-0063-y]
2. Gobbi S, Puglisi V, Ciaramella A. A rating system for integrating building performance tools in developing countries. Energy Procedia.2016; 96:333-344. [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.156]
3. Gowri K. Green building rating systems: an overview. ASHRAE Journal.2004; 46(11):56-60.
4. Lan L, Lian Z. Application of statistical power analysis-How to determine the right sample size in human health, comfort and productivity research. Building and Environment. 2010; 45(5):1202-1213. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.11.002]
5. Vilcekova S, Kridlova-Burdova E. Rating of indoor environmental quality in systems of sustability assessment of buildings. Journal of Civil Engineering.Environment and Architecture.2015; 62(4/15):459-467. [DOI:10.7862/rb.2015.210]
6. Al horr Y, Arif M, Katafygiotou M, et al. Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature,International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment .2016; 5(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006]
7. Apte MG, Fisk WJ, Daisey JM. Associations between indoor CO2 concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in U. S. office buildings: an analysis of the 1994-1996 BASE study data. Indoor Air; 2000; 10(4):246-257. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004246.x]
8. Fisk WJ, Lei-Gomez Q, Mendell MJ. Meta-analyses of the associations of respiratory health effects with dampness and mold in homes. Indoor Air.2007; 17(4):284-296. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00475.x]
9. Lewtas J. Air pollution combustion emissions: characterization of causative agents and mechanisms associated with cancer, reproductive, and cardiovascular effects. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research.2007; 636(1-3):95-133. [DOI:10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.08.003]
10. Houtman I, Douwes M, de Jong T, et al. Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policy. New Forms of Physical and Psychosocial Health Risks at Work, Study was request by the European Parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL). European Parliament. 2008.
11. Jaakkola MS, Quansah R, Hugg TT, et al. Association of indoor dampness and molds with rhinitis risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology .2013; 132(5):1099-1110. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.028]
12. Khoshbakht M, Gou Z, Xie X, et al. Green Building Occupant Satisfaction: Evidence from the Australian Higher Education Sector. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8):2890. [DOI:10.3390/su10082890]
13. Gayathri L, Perera BA, Sumanarathna DM. Factors affecting the indoor environmental quality in Sri Lanka: Green vs. Conventional hotel buildings. In The 5th World Construction Symposium. 2016:210-220.
14. Lombardi P. Understanding Sustainability in the Built Environment. A Framework for Evaluation in Urban Planning and Design, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Salford, September .1999.
15. Pickering C, Byrne J.The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research and Development.2014; 33(3):534-548. [DOI:10.1080/07294360.2013.841651]
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration.Annals of internal medicine. 2009; 151(4):65-94. [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135]
17. Huizenga C, Zagreus L, Abbaszadeh S,et al. LEED post-occupancy evaluation: Taking responsibility for the occupants. Proceedings of GreenBuild, 2005.
18. Abbaszadeh S, Zagreus L, Lehrer D, et al. Occupant Satisfaction with Indoor Environmental Quality in Green Buildings. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings. 2006; 3:365-70.
19. Edwards B. Benefits of Green Offices in the UK: analysis from examples built in the 1990s. Sustainable Development. 2006; 14(3):190-204. [DOI:10.1002/sd.263]
20. Leaman A, Thomas L, Vandenberg M. "GREEN" BUILDINGS: What Australian building users are saying.EcoLibrium(R). 2007; 6(10):22-30.
21. Leaman A, Bordass B. Are users more tolerant of "green" buildings? Building Research & Information.2007; 35(6):662-673. [DOI:10.1080/09613210701529518]
22. Paul WL, Taylor PA. A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building, Building and environment.2008; 43(11):1858-1870. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.006]
23. Lee YS, Kim S. Indoor Environmental Quality in LEED-Certified Buildings in the U.S .Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering.2008; 7(2):293-300. [DOI:10.3130/jaabe.7.293]
24. Lee YS, Guerin DA. Indoor environmental quality related to occupant satisfaction and performance in LEED-certified buildings. Indoor Built Environ.2009; 18(4):293-300. [DOI:10.1177/1420326X09105455]
25. Brown Z, Cole RJ. Influence of occupants' knowledge on comfort expectations and behaviour. Building Research & Information.2009; 37(3):227-245. [DOI:10.1080/09613210902794135]
26. Baird G. What the users think of sustainable buildings- A global overview. Routledge. 2010; 1-9. [DOI:10.4324/9780203865453]
27. Lee YS, Guerin DA. Indoor environmental quality differences between office types in LEED-certified buildings in the US. Building and Environment.2010; 45(5):1104-1112. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.019]
28. Hwang T. Effects of Indoor Lighting on Occupants' Visual Comfort and Eye Health in a Green Building. Indoor and Built Environment.2011; 20(1):75-90. [DOI:10.1177/1420326X10392017]
29. Brown Z, Cole RJ, Robinson J, et al. Evaluating user experience in green buildings in relation to workplace culture and context. Facilities.2010; 28(3-4):225-238. [DOI:10.1108/02632771011023168]
30. Thomas LE. Evaluating design strategies, performance and occupant satisfaction: a low carbon office refurbishment. Building Research & Information.2010; 38(6):610-624. [DOI:10.1080/09613218.2010.501654]
31. Zhang Y, Altan H. A comparison of the occupant comfort in a conventional high-rise office block and a contemporary environmentally-concerned building. Building and Environment.2011; 46(2):535-545. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.09.001]
32. Issa MH, Rankin JH, Attalla M, et al. Absenteeism, performance and occupant satisfaction with the indoor environment of Green toronto schools. Indoor and Built Environment.2011; 20(5): 511-523. [DOI:10.1177/1420326X11409114]
33. Singh A, Syal M, Korkmaz S, et al. Costs and Benefits of IEQ Improvements in LEED Office Buildings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems.2011; 17(2):86-94. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000046]
34. Gou Z, Lau SSY, Shen J. Indoor environmental satisfaction in two LEED offices and its implications in Green interior design. Indoor and Built Environment.2012; 21(4):503-514. [DOI:10.1177/1420326X11418700]
35. Baird G, Leaman A, Thompson J. A comparison of the performance of sustainable buildings with conventional buildings from the point of view of the users. Architectural Science Review. 2012; 55(2):135-44. [DOI:10.1080/00038628.2012.670699]
36. Mccunn LJ, Gifford R. Do green offices affect employee engagement and environmental attitudes? Architectural Science Review.2012; 55(2):128-134. [DOI:10.1080/00038628.2012.667939]
37. Deuble MP, de Dear RJ. Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link? Building and Environment.2012; 56:21-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.029]
38. Rashid M, Spreckelmeyer K, Angrisano NJ. Green buildings, environmental awareness, and organizational image. Journal of Corporate Real Estate.2012; 14(1):21-49. [DOI:10.1108/14630011211231428]
39. Thatcher A, Milner K. The impact of a 'green' building on employees' physical and psychological wellbeing, Work Joural. 2012; 41(1):3816-3823. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-2012-0683-3816]
40. Gou Z, Prasad D, Lau SSY. Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable? Habitat International.2013; 39:156-161. [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.12.007]
41. Newsham GR, Birt BJ, Arsenault C, et al. Do 'green'buildings have better indoor environments? New evidence. Building Research & Information.2013; 41(4):415-434. [DOI:10.1080/09613218.2013.789951]
42. Altomonte S, Schiavon S. Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Building and Environment.2013; 68:66-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008]
43. Menadue V, Soebarto V, Williamson T. The effect of internal environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in commercial office buildings. HVAC&R Research.2013; 19(8):1051-1062. [DOI:10.1080/10789669.2013.805630]
44. Agha-Hossein MM, El-Jouzi S, Elmualim A, et al. Post-occupancy studies of an office environment: Energy performance and occupants' satisfaction. Building and Environment.2013; 69:121-130. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.003]
45. Liang HH, Chen CP, Hwang RL, et al. Satisfaction of occupants toward indoor environment quality of certified green office buildings in Taiwan. Building and Environment.2014; 72:232-242. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.007]
46. .Hedge A, Miller L, Dorsey JA. Occupant comfort and health in green and conventional university buildings. Work.2014; 49(3):363-72. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-141870]
47. Pei Z, Lin B, Liu Y, et al. Comparative study on the indoor environment quality of green office buildings in China with a long-term field measurement and investigation. Building and Environment.2015; 84:80-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.015]
48. Kim SK, Hwang Y, Lee YS, et al. Occupant comfort and satisfaction in green healthcare environments: A survey study focusing on healthcare staff. Journal of Sustainable Development.2015; 8(1):156-173. [DOI:10.5539/jsd.v8n1p156]
49. Tham KW, Wargocki P, Tan YF. Indoor environmental quality, occupant perception, prevalence of sick building syndrome symptoms, and sick leave in a Green mark platinum-rated versus a non-Green mark-rated building: A case study. Science and Technology for the Built Environment.2015; 21(1):35-44. [DOI:10.1080/10789669.2014.967164]
50. Ravindu S, Rameezdeen R, Zuo J, et al. Indoor environment quality of green buildings: Case study of an LEED platinum certified factory in a warm humid tropical climate. Building and Environment. 2015; 84:105-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.001]
51. Altomonte S, Saadouni S, Schiavon S. Occupant satisfaction in LEED and BREEAM-certified office buildings. Proceedings of PLEA 2016-36th international conference on passive and low energy Architecture: Cities, buildings, People: Towards regenerative environments. Los Angeles, U.S.A. 11-13 July, 2016.
52. Lin B, Liu Y, Wang Z, et al. Measured energy use and indoor environment quality in green office buildings in China. Energy and Buildings.2016; 129:9-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.057]
53. Sediso BG, Lee MS. Indoor environmental quality in Korean green building certification criteria-certified office buildings-occupant satisfaction and performance. Science and Technology for the Built Environment.2016; 22(5):606-618. [DOI:10.1080/23744731.2016.1176849]
54. Thatcher A, Milner K. Is a green building really better for building occupants? A longitudinal evaluation. Building and Environment.2016; 108:194-206. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.036]
55. Altomontea S, Saadounia S, Kenta MG, et al.Satisfaction with Indoor Environmental Quality in BREEAM and non-BREEAM Certified Office Buildings. Architectural Science Review.2017; 60(4):343-55. [DOI:10.1080/00038628.2017.1336983]
56. Lee LY, Wargocki P, Chan YK, et al. Indoor environmental quality, occupant satisfaction, and acute building-related health symptoms in Green Mark-certified compared with non-certified office buildings. Indoor Air. 2019; 29(1):112-129. [DOI:10.1111/ina.12515]
57. Singh A, Syal M, Grady SC, et al. Effects of Green buildings on employee health and productivity. American Journal of Public Health.2010; 100(9):1665-1668. [DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2009.180687]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
