Volume 12, Issue 2 (11-2023)                   JCHR 2023, 12(2): 206-216 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rashidi Maybodi F, Falahati Marvasti Z, Nadjarzadeh A. Knowledge and Practice of Present and Future Dentists about Nutrition Counseling in Yazd, Iran in 2022. JCHR 2023; 12 (2) :206-216
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-999-en.html
1- Department of Periodontics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , rashidimeibodi.fahimeh@gmail.com
2- School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3- Department of Nutrition, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 692 kb]   (236 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (494 Views)
Full-Text:   (77 Views)
Knowledge and Practice of Present and Future Dentists about Nutrition Counseling in Yazd, Iran in 2022

Fahimeh Rashidi Maybodi 1 * , Zahra Falahati Marvasti 2 , Azadeh Nadjarzadeh 3
  1. Department of Periodontics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  2. School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  3. Department of Nutrition, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Original Article
Received: 10 May 2023
Accepted: 07 Jul 2023
Background: Inadequate nutrition can affect oral health. Compromised oral health can also alter food choices and negatively lead to poor nutrition. This study aims to assess the knowledge and practice of dentists and dental students regarding nutrition counseling.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a valid and reliable four-part questionnaire was conducted among senior students and dentists in Yazd city in February 2022. All 40 senior students in the Faculty of Dentistry were selected by census method, and 98 dentists were selected randomly from all the names registered in the system of Medical Council. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 25 and t-test and Chi-square tests were used (P-value < 0.05)
Results: Out of a score 9, the mean score of knowledge was 7.12 ± 1.75 for dentists and 6.48 ± 1.2 for students. The mean score of dentists was higher than students (P = 0.03). Out of a score of 10, the mean score of dentists and students' practice were 3.26 ± 2.43 and 3.20 ± 1.82, respectively. There was no significant difference regarding the mean score practice in two groups
(P = 0.879).

Conclusions:  The knowledge level of both groups was not good but acceptable, and the quality of practice in both groups was poor. It seems that there is a need for corrective educational interventions to improve the practice of dentists and dental students.

Keywords: Dentists, Counseling, Cross-Sectional Studies, Students.



Corresponding Author:
Fahimeh Rashidi Maybodi
rashidimeibodi.fahimeh@gmail.com
How to cite this paper:
Rashidi Maybodi F, Falahati Marvasti Z, Nadjarzadeh A. Knowledge and Practice of Present and Future Dentists about Nutrition Counseling in Yazd, Iran in 2022. J Community Health Research 2023; 12(2): 206-216.


Introduction
Nutrition counseling is an interactive process in which, a healthcare provider counsels the patients to assess their dietary intake and help them to adopt to healthy nutritional behaviors (1). Nutrition has a critical role in health promotion and disease prevention; thus, all healthcare practitioners need to have optimal counseling skills in order to be able to assist patients in this important task(2).
A balanced healthy nutrition plays a fundamental role in preserving the symbiotic relationship between oral microorganisms (3) and can prevent adverse effects of malnutrition and excessive consumption of sugar or alcohol on oral health (4, 5). Therefore, dentists should make their patients aware that inclusion of vitamins, calcium, zinc, and polyphenols in diet can prevent the progression of oral problems such as periodontal disease (3). Furthermore, patients seeking multiple teeth extraction should be informed about the adverse effects of impaired mastication on the quality of nutrition and its subsequent impact on general health, and encouraged to replace extracted teeth as soon as possible (6). Gradual tooth loss in the elderly also results in unfavorable changes in their diet (7). Pregnant women require nutrition counseling as well, as increased gag reflex and tendency to consume sugary foods during pregnancy may increase the risk of caries, and mother to child transmission of cariogenic bacteria may also occur (8). Moreover, some changeable risk factors such as obesity can predispose the patients to periodontitis, caries, and oral malignancies (6, 9-11). Improper nutrition is responsible for increased risk of hypertension, diabetes, and osteoporosis (6). All these contents should be included in the nutrition counseling process by a dentist with a comprehensive preventive approach. Guiding the patient to have a healthier diet can be more effective in controlling diabetes and improving periodontal health (9, 11) as higher consumption of fibers helps in better control of blood sugar (3). Vitamins and minerals are also required for bone formation and periodontal regeneration (12). Modifying the nutritional pattern can reduce the progression of gingivitis into periodontitis (12, 13). A healthy diet is also important in orthodontic patients to prevent the formation of caries (14). Higher consumption of grains, fruits, and unsweetened dairy products is associated with lower risk of caries; whereas consumption of foods containing added sugars, or hydrolyzed starchy products increases this risk (1). Sweet drinks are also associated with higher rate of caries, compared with solid foods (1, 15). Moreover, oral lesions are more common in patients with malnutrition (15).
Considering all the above mentioned, nutrition counseling can be considered a part of routine preventive dental care (1, 6). However, it appears that shortage of time and lack of dentists' knowledge regarding the significance of nutrition counseling are barriers against correct implementation of this task. Evidence shows that dentists can play an important role in motivating their patients to adopt a healthy diet.
However, the knowledge and attitude of dentists regarding nutrition counseling seems insufficient (2, 4). Thus, this study aims to assess the knowledge and practice of dentists and dental students regarding nutrition counseling.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted on dentists practicing in Yazd and senior dental students of School of dentistry, in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in February 2022. Unfortunately, there was no study on the population of dentists or dental students. Based on a similar study by Bapat (4) on the evaluation of dental nutrition knowledge among nutrition students, assuming a standard deviation and the knowledge mean score of 1.72, an estimated error of 0.35 in the aforementioned study, and a 95% confidence level, in this study, 98 dentists were selected as a sample size from the list of dentists registered in the Medical Council file by a systematic random method. In addition, all the 40 senior students of school of dentistry were recruited by census sampling. Inclusion criteria were having a minimum of 6 months of work experience for dentists and passing the nutrition course for dental students. Incomplete questionnaires were excluded.  The method of answering designed questions was compared in two groups of dentists and students.
Data collection
A researcher-designed, four-part questionnaire was used. The first part included demographic information including age, gender, and work experience; the second part included 9 questions regarding the knowledge of participants; the third part consisted of 6 questions regarding attitude, and the fourth part contained 10 questions about practice, all with respect to nutrition counseling.
Assessment of validity and reliability of the questionnaire:
Content validity was evaluated using the Lawshe’s model. The opinions of 10 faculty members were quantified using the content validity index, which was calculated as 0.8. Thus, no item was finally rejected or revised. Regarding reliability, internal consistency of questions was assessed by calculating the cronbach’s alpha, which was 0.7.
Knowledge and practice questions were scored as follows:
In knowledge part, each correct answer was scored 1, “I do not know” response was scored 0.5, and wrong answers were scored 0. In practice part, each ‘Yes’ answer was scored 1, and each ‘No’ answer scored 0. To report knowledge level qualitatively, the following classification system was used: Scores 8-9: were considered good, 6-8:  acceptable, and scores < 6 were considered poor. To report the quality of practice, the following classification was used: Scores 8-10 were considered good, 5-8, acceptable, and < 5 were regarded as poor scores. Responses to attitude questions were reported as frequency values.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by SPSS version 25. T-test and chi-square tests were used and the level of significance was 0.05.
Results
Of 138 questionnaires, 98 were filled out by general dentists with a mean age of 31.76 ± 6.16, and 40 were filled out by students with a mean age of 24.30 ± 0.75. Tables 1 and 2 present demographic information and frequency distribution of answers to knowledge questions respectively. The mean score of knowledge was 7.12 ± 1.75 in dentists and 6.48 ± 1.2 in students, both of which were considered acceptable. According to the t-test, the knowledge mean score of the dentists was higher than that of the students (P = 0.03).
Table 1. Demographic information of participants
Variable Number (percent)
Group Dental students 40 (29%)
Dentists 98 (71%)
Gender Dentists Male 46 (46.9%)
Female 52 (53.1%)
Dental students Male 18 (45%)
Female 22 (55%)
Age group (yrs.) Dentists 25-34 69 (70.4%)
35-44 29 (29.6%)
Dental students 24-23 23 (57.5%)
26-25 17 (42.5%)
Work experience of dentists ≥ 5 years 45 (54.9%)
< 5 years 53 (54.1%)

Table 2. Frequency distribution of answers to knowledge questions
Question Answer choice Group
Dentists Dental students
Number (percentage) Number (percentage)
1. Can antioxidant decrease the level of periodontal inflammation? Yes* (62.2%)61 (55.0%)22
No (12.2%)12 (2.5%)1
I do not know (25.5%)25 (42.5%)17
2. Is low intake of calcium and dairy products associated with higher severity of periodontitis? Yes* (45.9%)45 (37.5%)15
No (19.4%)19 (15.0%)6
I do not know (34.7%)34 (47.5%)19
3. Does consumption of sugary materials along with meals, compared to their use alone, decrease the risk of caries? Yes* (69.4%)68 (37.5%)15
No (12.2%)12 (25.0%)10
I do not know (18.4%)18 (37.5%)15
4.Does obesity increase the risk of periodontitis? Yes* (75.5%)74 (65.0%)26
No (10.2%)10 (7.5%)3
I do not know (14.3%)14 (27.5%)11
5. Does obesity increase the risk of caries? Yes (62.2%)61 (50.0%)20
No (14.3%)14 (25.0%)10
I do not know (23.5%)23 (25.0%)10
6. Does sweet drinks increase the risk of caries more than solid foods? Yes* (70.4%)69 (55.0%)22
No (14.3%)14 (27.5%)11
I do not know (15.3%)15 (17.5%)7
7. Does periodontitis increase the risk of hypertension? Yes* (73.5%)72 (62.5%)25
No (9.2%)9 (10.0%)4
I do not know (17.3%)17 (27.5%)11
8. Is consumption of fruit juice associated with higher risk of caries than fruits? Yes* (77.6%)76 (67.5%)27
No (11.2%)11 (12.5%)5
I do not know (11.2%)11 (20.5%)8
9. Is frequency of consumption of sugary substances more important than daily sum of consumption in development of caries? Yes* (93.9%)92 (92.5%)37
No (2.0%)2 (0.0%)0
I do not know (4.1%)4 (7.5%)3
*T-test
No significant correlation was observed between the dentists' mean score of knowledge dentists and their age, gender, or experience (Table 3). In addition, no significant correlation was found between the knowledge score of students and age or gender (Table 3).
Tables 4 and 5 present the frequency distribution of answers to attitude and practice questions, respectively.
Table 3. Comparing the mean scores of knowledge regarding the two groups based on their demographics
Participants Knowledge
Variable
Mean Std. deviation P-value*
Dentists Gender Male 7.17 1.62 0.80
Female 7.08 1.87
Age group (yrs.) 25-34 7.20 1.59 0.51
35-44 6.94 2.14
Work experience (years) < 5 years 7.00 1.64 0.43
≥ 5 years 7.24 1.88
Dental students Gender Male 6.44 1.36 0.84
Female 6.52 1.08
Age group (yrs.) 25-34 6.28 1.32 0.21
35-44 6.76 0.97
*T-test
Table 4. Frequency distribution of answers to attitude questions
Question Answer Group
Dentists Dental students
Number
(percentage)
Number
(percentage)
1. Which of the followings are the advantages of nutrition counseling in the first visit? (you can choose more than one answer) Having an overall estimate of the oral  health of patient 65 (66.3%) 23 (57.5%)
Assessment of the success rate of treatment (tissue regeneration capacity, risk of infection, etc.) 41 (41.8%) 12 (30.0%)
Finding unhealthy nutritional habits (fat overuse, insufficient fiber intake, soft regimen, high consumption of fast foods) 67(68.4%) 25 (62.5%)
2. Do you think that counseling regarding nutritional habits is should be included in preventive dental care? Yes 78(79.6%) 29 (72.5%)
No 7 (7.1%) 7 (17.5%)
No opinion 13 (13.3%) 4 (10.0%)
3. What are the major obstacles against provision of nutrition counseling to your patients? (please choose up to two choices) Not having adequate information in this regard 46 (46.9%) 23 (57.5%)
Time-consuming nature of nutrition counseling 60 (61.2%) 14 (35.0%)
Possibility of hurting the patients’ feelings 13 (13.3%) 5 (12.5%)
I do not see any reason to do so 19 (19.4%) 3 (7.5%)
I do not have adequate confidence to do so 9 (9.2%) 7 (17.5%)
I think it will not be effective 15 (15.3%) 13 (32.5%)
4. Do you think that you received adequate information about nutrition during your education? Yes 22 (22.4%) 7 (17.5%)
No 50 (51.0%) 25 (62.5%)
No opinion 26 (26.5%) 8 (20.0%)
5. Do you think that if dentist cannot provide nutrition counseling, should refer the patient to a nutritionist? Yes 39 (39.8%) 21 (52.5%)
No 38 (38.8%) 11 (27.5%)
No opinion 21 (21.4%) 8 (20.0%)
6. What is your main source for nutritional information? Undergraduate dental curriculum 23 (23.5%) 10 (25.0%)
Retraining courses 10 (10.2%) 4 (10.0%)
Miscellaneous studies 37 (37.8%) 20 (0.50%)
scientific congresses and seminars 1 (1.0%) 6 (15.0%)
Social media 27 (27.6%) 0 (0.0%)
Table 5. Comparison of the mean scores of practice based on demographics
Participants Practice
Variable
Mean± Std. deviation P-value*
Dentists Gender Male 2.97 ± 2.04 0.275
Female 3.51 ± 2.73
Age group (yrs.) 25-34 3.37 ± 2.39 0.488
35-44 2.85 ± 2.49
Work experience (years) < 5 years 3.86 ± 2.31 0.008*
≥ 5 years 2.55 ± 2.41
Dental students Gender Male 3.50 ± 1.79 0.355
Female 2.95 ± 1.86
Age group (yrs.) 23-24 3.21 ± 1.83 0.945
25-26 3.17 ± 1.87
The chi-square test showed no significant difference in responses to attitude and practice questions based on variables, except for the following items: a significantly higher percentage of dentists with an experience of over 5 years would refer their patients for counseling if they could not provide it to their patients (P = 0.01). Furthermore, a significantly higher percentage of dentists with over 5 years of experience selected undergraduate education as their main source of knowledge about nutrition (P = 0.01). A higher percentage of male students had a positive attitude towards nutrition counseling as a preventive dental care (P = 0.002).
The mean score of practice was 3.26 ± 2.43 in dentists and 3.20 ± 1.82 in students out of a score of 10, both of which were considered poor. According to t-test, there was no significant difference between dentists and students (P = 0.879). Moreover, the
t-test showed no significant correlation between the dentists' mean score of practice and age and gender (Table 5). However, generally, the dentists with less experience had better practice (P = 0.008). No significant correlation was found between the students' mean practice score and age or gender (Table 5). A significantly high percentage of female students prescribed supplements (P = 0.03). A higher percentage of dentists with experience of over 5 years (P = 0.001) and younger dentists (P = 0.03) prescribed probiotics. Moreover, many dentists with an experience of over 5 years advised weight loss to overweight patients (P = 0.01). Frequency distribution of answers to practice questions in both groups is shown in Table 6.
Table 6. Frequency distribution of answers to practice questions
Question Answer Group
Dentists Dental students
Number (percentage) Number (percentage)
1. Do you advise your patients to consume probiotics to promote oral health? Yes 39 (39.8%) 15 (37.5%)
No 59 (60.2%) 25 (62.5%)
2. If your patient is overweight, would you advise her/him to lose weight? Yes 41 (41.8%) 23 (57.5%)
No 57 (58.2%) 17 (42.5%)
3. Do you record the weight and BMI of patients prior to dental examination? Yes 7 (7.1%) 0 (0.0%)
No 91 (92.9%) 40 (100%)
4. Do you emphasize proper postoperative nutritional recommendations after tooth extraction or other surgical procedures? Yes 60 (61.2%) 25 (62.5%)
No 38 (38.8%) 15 (37.5%)
5. Have you ever recommended supplementation to improve periodontal health of your patients? Yes 27 (27.6%) 9 (22.5%)
No 71 (72.4%) 31 (77.5%)
6. Do you inform the patient about the consequences of tooth extraction such as nutritional impairments and their impact on systemic health? Yes 56 (57.1%) 30 (75.0%)
No 42 (42.9%) 10 (25.0%)
7. Do you advise assessment of the level of vitamin D in patients with periodontitis? Yes 28 (28.6%) 17 (42.5%)
No 70 (71.4%) 23 (57.5%)
8. Have you ever received nutrition counseling? Yes 17 (17.3%) 5 (12.5%)
No 81 (82.7%) 35 (87.5%)
9. Have you ever recommended the inclusion of vitamin D-rich foods such as fish or egg yok in daily diet to patients with recurrent aphthous or progressive bone loss? Yes 21 (21.4%) 6 (15.0%)
No 77 (78.6%) 34 (85.5%)
10. Have you ever participated in a workshop about nutrition? Yes 13 (13.3%) 5 (12.5%)
No 85 (86.7%) 35 (87.5%)
Discussion
The American Dental Association has encouraged dentists to update their knowledge about nutritional recommendations related to oral health (16). However, this topic has been largely ignored by dentists (17). This study evaluated the knowledge and practice of dentists and students regarding nutrition counseling. The mean score of knowledge for both groups was acceptable, which was in agreement with the results of Vaidya et al.'s research (16); they assessed the knowledge level of students majoring in nutrition. However, the results were different from those of Dolatkhah et al.'s study (18) which assessed the knowledge of medical students and Bapat et al.'s project (4) which discussed the knowledge of nutrition students. Moreover, dental students only had the knowledge about the basics of nutrition based on Abdullah et al.'s research (19), and there is a need for inclusion of further nutritional topics in dental curricula.
The participants' mean score of knowledge had no significant correlation with gender, which was consistent with several studies (1, 2, 4, 18, 20). The mean score of knowledge had no significant correlation with age, which was consistent with the results from Alamri (20) and Dolatkhah's studies (18).
In the current study, the dentists' mean score of knowledge was significantly higher than students. Similar results were shown by Abdullah et al. (19) who reported higher knowledge score in senior students compared with junior ones; Chalmuri et al (2), Vaidya et al. (16) demonstrated higher knowledge score in graduates compared with students; and Bapat et al. (4) reported higher score of third year students in comparison with first and second year students.
The score of dentists' mean score of knowledge had no significant correlation with their experience, which has not been evaluated in any other study.
In the present study, 62.2% of dentists and 55% of students believed that antioxidants can decrease inflammation in periodontitis due to their anti-inflammatory properties (21-23). Moreover, calcium supplementation can positively affect the management of periodontitis (24). Optimal calcium content can decelerate tooth loss and bone resorption (25-27). In the present study, 45.9% of the dentists and 37.5% of the students were aware of the correlation between low calcium intake and periodontitis.
Several studies reported the association of obesity with caries and periodontitis (6, 27, 28). In the present study, 75.5% of the dentists and 65% of the students were aware of the association of obesity with periodontitis, and 62.2% of the dentists and half of the students believed that obesity was associated with caries. Periodontitis can lead to hypertension (29-33). 73.5% of the dentists and 62.5% of the students in the present study considered hypertension a consequence of periodontitis.
In this study, 69.4% of the dentists and 37.5% of the dental students believed that consumption of sugary substances alone was more cariogenic than their consumption with meals; however, only 1.7% of nutrition students in the study by Bapat et al. (4) agreed with this statement. In the present study, 77.6% of the dentists and 76.5% of the students believed that fruit juices were more cariogenic than fruits, and 70.4% of the dentists and 55% of the students thought that sweet drinks were more cariogenic than sweet solid foods. In a study by Shah et al (34), 73% of the dental students linked the consumption of fruit juices to caries. In the present study, most of the participants in both groups correctly believed that the consumption frequency of sugar was more important in caries development than the total amount of consumption. However, in the study by Bapat et al, (4) most of the students had a different idea. This difference may be due to the fact that dental practitioners pay more attention to nutritional tips related to oral health compared with students of nutrition major.
Only 41.8% of dentists and 30% of students believed that nutrition counseling can improve the success of dental treatment; but, in a study by Ritchie et al. (35) most of the participants believed that it can increase the success of treatment.
In the present study, 79.6% of the dentists and 72.5% of the students agreed with that nutrition counseling should be included in preventive programs. In a study by Hseiki et al, (36) 94.8% of the physicians believed that proper nutrition was important in prevention of systemic diseases. In studies by Abdullah et al (19), Nidhi et al. (1) and Alamri et al. (20), the majority of dental students were of the idea that nutrition counseling was an inseparable part of oral care. In a study by Morge et al, (37) 71.7% of medical students considered nutrition counseling a part of routine care. Despite the positive attitude towards this topic, assessment of practice in the present study revealed that 61.2% of the dentists and 35% of the students considered that time-consuming nature of counseling, and 46.9% of the dentists and 57.5% of the students stated that not having adequate information were the main reasons for not providing patients with counseling. Furthermore, time-consuming nature of counseling was reported as the main obstacle by 36.3% of dental hygienists in a study by Cole et al (38), 36.3% of dental students in the study by Sivakumar et al (17) and 62.4% of physicians in the study by Hseiki et al (36). Regarding children, Sim et al. (39)reported that the main obstacle against nutrition counseling was lack of interest of parents, while Wright (40) reported that the main concern was parents' negative reaction. However, only 13.3% of dentists and 12.5% of the students were worried about the reaction of patients in the present study. Lack of self-confidence to provide counseling was reported by 9.2% of the dentists and 17.5% of the students, while this rate was 35.1% among dental students in Shah's study (34).
In this study, 39.8% of the dentists and half of the students reported referral of patients to a nutritionist. This rate was 39.1% in the study by Sivakumar et al, (17) and 53.7% in the study by Hseiki et al (36). 51% of the dentists and 62.5% of the students in the present study complained that they did not receive adequate nutritional information during education. This rate was 49.6% in the research by Hseiki et al.(36), 25.7% in the study by Abdullah et al. (19), 42% in the study by Sivakuamr et al. (17), and 64.9% in the study by Shah et al. (34). Such wide range of variation can be due to different educational curricula. In the present study, 37.8% of the dentists and 50% of the students claimed that they acquired their current information through non-academic studies, pointing to the insufficient education. This rate was 18% in the study by Cole et al. (38). Other studies did not address this topic  ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (1, 2, 4, 16, 18-32, 34, 35). In the current study, 7.1% of the dentists and none of the students reported patients' weight and BMI recording. This rate was 61.2% in the study by Hseiki et al. (36), 72.6% in the study by Morge et al. (37), and 20% in the study by Bell et al. (41).
86.7% of the study's dentists reported no participation in related retraining courses. This rate was 72.9% in the study by Alamri et al. (20) and 73% in the study by Nidhi (1), which were consistent with the results of this study. Only one out of four in both groups reported supplements prescription. This rate was higher in Alamri (20) and Sivakuamr studies (17) ,which may be due to stronger belief in efficacy of supplements.
The efficacy of probiotics for risk reduction of caries and periodontitis has been well documented (42-44). Nonetheless, 60.2% of the dentists and 62.5% of the students did not recommend probiotics, and 58.2% of the dentists and 42.5% of the students did not advise their patients to lose weight. In the present study, about 60% of both groups instructed the patients regarding post-treatment diet, and 57.1% of the dentists and 75% of the students reported that they would inform about adverse consequences of tooth extraction. These items were not focused in previous studies.
Bone loss and recurrent aphthous ulcers have been linked to inadequate intake of vitamin D (45, 46). However, 71.4% of dentists and 57.5% of dental students reported that they would not measure the level of vitamin D in patients with bone loss. Also, 78.6% of the dentists and 85.5% of the students did not recommend vitamin D supplementation to patients with aphthous ulcers and progressive bone resorption. Moreover, most of the participants had never received nutrition counseling to possibly improve their attitude. A large number of less experienced dentists reported referral of patients to a nutritionist with prescribed probiotics, which may be due to their updated knowledge. Thus, retraining courses can be planned to update older dentists. The role modeling of dental professors in providing nutritional recommendations to patients can also help future dentists believe that they can be effective in improving the nutritional health of patients. It is suggested to re-evaluate the knowledge and practice of participants within one year after these corrective measures.
Conclusion
The mean score of knowledge in both groups were not good but were acceptable level, and the knowledge of dentists was higher than students. No significant difference was found in the mean score of practice in both groups, which were at poor level. Despite the acceptable level of knowledge among participants regarding nutrition counseling and their belief in its necessity, this positive knowledge did not lead to appropriate practice; this highlights the need for corrective educational interventions with emphasis on practice.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the dentists and dental students participating in this study.
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was supported by Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences.
Authors declared no conflict of interests.
Ethical considerations
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Shahdi Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (IR.SSU.DENTISTRY.REC.1400.032). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants as the first page of questionnaire.
Code of Ethics
IR.SSU.DENTISTRY.REC.1400.032
Authors’ contributions
F.R.M, suggested the main idea, supervised the conduction of the study, and prepared and translated the manuscript into English; Z.F.M, collected data; A.N and prepared the questionnaire. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Open Access Policy
JCHR does not charge readers and their institution for access to its papers. Full text download of all new and archived papers are free of charge.



References
  1. Rajesh Nidhi KR, Ramakrishnan M. Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding diet counseling among dental undergraduate students. Drug Discov Today. 2019; 12(6): 1290-3.
  2. Chalmuri Y, Padma TM, Pratap KVNR, et al. Do the dental students have enough nutritional knowledge? A survey among students of a dental college in Telangana State. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2018; 16(1): 38-47.
  3. Martinon P, Fraticelli L, Giboreau A, et al. Nutrition as a Key Modifiable Factor for Periodontitis and Main Chronic Diseases. Journal of clinical medicine. 2021; 10(2): 197.
  4. Bapat S, Asawa K, Bhat N, et al. Assessment of dental nutrition knowledge among nutrition/dietetics students. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(11): ZC37-40.
  5. Pflipsen M, Zenchenko Y. Nutrition for oral health and oral manifestations of poor nutrition and unhealthy habits. Gen Dent. 2017; 65(6): 36-43.
  6. Palacios C, Joshipura K, Willett W. Nutrition and health: guidelines for dental practitioners. Oral Dis. 2009; 15(6): 369-81.
  7. Shigli K, Nayak SS, Menon K, et al. Dietary counseling: A requisite in geriatric prosthodontics. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2020; 9(9): 5081-2.
  8. Rocha JS, Arima LY, Werneck RI, et al. Determinants of Dental Care Attendance during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Caries research. 2018; 52(1-2): 139-52.
  9. Graves DT, Ding Z, Yang Y. The impact of diabetes on periodontal diseases. Periodontology 2000. 2020; 82(1): 214-24.
  10. Jenzsch A, Eick S, Rassoul F, et al. Nutritional intervention in patients with periodontal disease: clinical, immunological and microbiological variables during 12 months. The British journal of nutrition. 2009; 101(6): 879-85.
  11. Oberti L, Gabrione F, Nardone M, et al. Two-way relationship between diabetes and periodontal disease: a reality or a paradigm? Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents. 2019; 33(3 Suppl. 1): 153-9. dental supplement.
  12. Pathan FL, Ardale GUM, Vyavhare S. Nutrition In Periodontal Health And Disease. Maharashtra Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Latur. 2020; 2(2): 13-9.
  13. Santonocito S, Polizzi A, Palazzo G, et al. Dietary Factors Affecting the Prevalence and Impact of Periodontal Disease. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry. 2021; 13: 283-92.
  14. Aljohani SR, Alsaggaf DH. Adherence to Dietary Advice and Oral Hygiene Practices Among Orthodontic Patients. Patient preference and adherence. 2020; 14: 1991-2000.
  15. Moynihan PJ. Dietary advice in dental practice. British dental journal. 2002; 193(10): 563-8.
  16. Vaidya RY, Shivani VMR, Santosh S, et al. Knowledge of nutrition among students in a dental teaching institution in Kerala. Amrita j med. 2020; 16(4): 175-80.
  17. Sivakumar V, Jain J, Tikare S, et al. Perception of diet counseling among dental students in India. Saudi J Oral Sci. 2016; 3(1): 36-41.
  18. Dolatkhah N, Aghamohammadi D, Farshbaf-Khalili A, et al. Nutrition knowledge and attitude in medical students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in 2017-2018. BMC research notes. 2019; 12(1): 757. [Persian]
  19. Abdullah Z, Rathinavel K, Senthilkumar K, et al. Assessment of dental nutrition knowledge among dental students in Chennai. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021; 9(1): 24-8. [Persian]
  20. Alamri MS, Alamri SA, Ingle A, et al. knowledge, attitude, and practice of diet counselling among dental interns and postgraduate students in Riyadh city, kingdom of Saudi arabia. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research 2020; 11(4): 38327-38335. DOI: 10.24327/IJRSR
  21. Chapple IL, Milward MR, Dietrich T. The prevalence of inflammatory periodontitis is negatively associated with serum antioxidant concentrations. The Journal of nutrition. 2007; 137(3): 657-64.
  22. Talmaç AC, Çalişir M. Antioxidants and Periodontal Diseases.  Gingival Disease-A Professional Approach for Treatment and Prevention: IntechOpen; 2019.
  23. Vo TTT, Chu PM, Tuan VP, et al. The Promising Role of Antioxidant Phytochemicals in the Prevention and Treatment of Periodontal Disease via the Inhibition of Oxidative Stress Pathways: Updated Insights. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2020; 9(12): 1211.
  24. Sllamniku Dalipi Z, Dragidella F. Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation as Non-Surgical Treatment for Periodontal Disease with a Focus on Female Patients: Literature Review. Dentistry journal. 2022; 10(7): 120.
  25. Garcia MN, Hildebolt CF, Miley DD, et al. One-year effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on chronic periodontitis. Journal of periodontology. 2011; 82(1): 25-32.
  26. Aboelsaad N. The effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in chronic periodontitis patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2019; 65(2-April (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)): 1311-21.
  27. Arboleda S, Vargas M, Losada S, et al. Review of obesity and periodontitis: an epidemiological view. British dental journal. 2019; 227(3): 235-9.
  28. Pischon N, Heng N, Bernimoulin JP, et al. Obesity, inflammation, and periodontal disease. Journal of dental research. 2007; 86(5): 400-9.
  29. Czerniuk MR, Bartoszewicz Z, Dudzik-Niewiadomska I, et al. Simple platelet markers: Mean platelet volume and congestive heart failure coexistent with periodontal disease. Pilot studies. Cardiology journal. 2019; 26(3): 253-9. PubMed PMID: 28714524.
  30. Czerniuk MR, Bartoszewicz Z, Filipiak KJ, et al. Plasmatic NT-proBNP concentrations in patients with coexistent periodontal disease and congestive heart failure: pilot studies. Kardiologia polska. 2017; 75(2): 135-42.
  31. Czerniuk MR, Górska R, Filipiak KJ, et al. Inflammatory response to acute coronary syndrome in patients with coexistent periodontal disease. Journal of periodontology. 2004; 75(7): 1020-6.
  32. Czerniuk MR, Górska R, Filipiak KJ, et al. C-reactive protein in patients with coexistent periodontal disease and acute coronary syndromes. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2006; 33(6): 415-20.
  33. Surma S, Romańczyk M, Witalińska-Łabuzek J, et al. Periodontitis, Blood Pressure, and the Risk and Control of Arterial Hypertension: Epidemiological, Clinical, and Pathophysiological Aspects-Review of the Literature and Clinical Trials. Current hypertension reports. 2021; 23(5): 27.
  34. Shah K, Hunter ML, Fairchild RM, et al. A comparison of the nutritional knowledge of dental, dietetic and nutrition students. British dental journal. 2011; 210(1): 33-8.
  35. Ritchie CS, Joshipura K, Hung HC, et al. Nutrition as a mediator in the relation between oral and systemic disease: associations between specific measures of adult oral health and nutrition outcomes. Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists. 2002; 13(3): 291-300.
  36. Hseiki RA, Osman MH, El-Jarrah RT, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Lebanese primary care physicians in nutrition counseling: a self-reported survey. Primary health care research & development. 2017; 18(6): 629-34.
  37. Mogre V, Aryee PA, Stevens FC, et al. Future doctors’ nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy regarding nutrition care in the general practice setting: a cross-sectional survey. Med Sci Educ. 2017; 27(3): 481-8.
  38. Cole DDM, Boyd LD, Vineyard J, et al. Childhood Obesity: Dental hygienists' beliefs attitudes and barriers to patient education. Journal of dental hygiene. 2018; 92(2): 38-49.
  39. Sim CJ, Iida H, Vann WF, et al. Dietary recommendations for infants and toddlers among pediatric dentists in North Carolina. Pediatric dentistry. 2014; 36(4): 322-8.
  40. Wright R, Casamassimo PS. Assessing attitudes and actions of pediatric dentists toward childhood obesity and sugar-sweetened beverages. Journal of public health dentistry. 2017; 77 Suppl 1: S79-s87.
  41. Bell KP, Phillips C, Paquette DW, et al. Incorporating oral-systemic evidence into patient care: practice behaviors and barriers of North Carolina dental hygienists. Journal of dental hygiene. 2011; 85(2): 99-113.
  42. Kumar VN, Krishnamurthy M, Poorni S, et al. Probiotics in Caries Prevention. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2018; 19(2): 123-4. PubMed PMID:
  43. Lin YJ, Chou CC, Hsu CS. Effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota intake on caries risk in children. Journal of dental sciences. 2017; 12(2): 179-84.
  44. Poorni S, Srinivasan MR, Nivedhitha MS. Probiotic Streptococcus strains in caries prevention: A systematic review. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2019; 22(2): 123-8.
  45. Al-Zahrani MS. Increased intake of dairy products is related to lower periodontitis prevalence. Journal of periodontology. 2006; 77(2): 289-94.
  46. Öztekin A, Öztekin C. Vitamin D levels in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. BMC oral health. 2018; 18(1): 186.
Review: Research | Subject: Public Health
Received: 2023/05/10 | Accepted: 2023/09/11 | Published: 2023/11/28

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Community Health Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb