Volume 11, Issue 2 (6-2022)
JCHR 2022, 11(2): 99-106 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rashidi Maybodi F, Shayeghi M. Patients' Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Dental Implants. JCHR 2022; 11 (2) :99-106
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-759-en.html
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-759-en.html
1- Associate professor, Periodontics Department, Dental Faculty, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , f_rashidi63@yahoo.com
2- Dentistry student, Dental Faculty, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
2- Dentistry student, Dental Faculty, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Abstract: (1055 Views)
Abstract
Introduction: The more informed a patient about a treatment, the better the obtained outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of the patients regarding dental implants and determine the sources of information and also the accuracy of received information.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 246 participants with the age of at least 20 years, were randomly selected. A researcher-made questionnaire including demographic characteristics and questions related to participants' knowledge and attitude was used. Data were analyzed by SPSS.23 and p -value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results: The mean score of the participants ' knowledge on dental implants was 8.08 ± 2.12 out of 12. The primary main source of patients for getting information was friends and acquaintances (32.9%), followed by dentists (26.8%). The level of knowledge was higher in younger (P-value: 0.00) and educated ones (P-value: 0.00) and in those who had insurance coverage (P-value: 0.012). The main reason for not choosing implant treatment in 58.9% of participants was high costs. There was no relationship between gender (P-value: 0.55) and monthly income of patients (P-value: 0.09) with their level of knowledge. The results revealed that knowledge level of the participants about durability of implants, possible negative points of choosing this treatment, location of placement, body material, types of implant-based treatments, probable complications after treatment and health cares needed for dental implant was low; Therefore, it seems necessary to improve the level of information of participants and to correct their information sources.
Introduction: The more informed a patient about a treatment, the better the obtained outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of the patients regarding dental implants and determine the sources of information and also the accuracy of received information.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 246 participants with the age of at least 20 years, were randomly selected. A researcher-made questionnaire including demographic characteristics and questions related to participants' knowledge and attitude was used. Data were analyzed by SPSS.23 and p -value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results: The mean score of the participants ' knowledge on dental implants was 8.08 ± 2.12 out of 12. The primary main source of patients for getting information was friends and acquaintances (32.9%), followed by dentists (26.8%). The level of knowledge was higher in younger (P-value: 0.00) and educated ones (P-value: 0.00) and in those who had insurance coverage (P-value: 0.012). The main reason for not choosing implant treatment in 58.9% of participants was high costs. There was no relationship between gender (P-value: 0.55) and monthly income of patients (P-value: 0.09) with their level of knowledge. The results revealed that knowledge level of the participants about durability of implants, possible negative points of choosing this treatment, location of placement, body material, types of implant-based treatments, probable complications after treatment and health cares needed for dental implant was low; Therefore, it seems necessary to improve the level of information of participants and to correct their information sources.
Review: Research |
Subject:
Public Health
Received: 2021/04/28 | Accepted: 2022/06/20 | Published: 2022/07/5
Received: 2021/04/28 | Accepted: 2022/06/20 | Published: 2022/07/5
References
1. Schwartz‐ Arad D, Herzberg R, Levin L. Evaluation of long‐ term implant success. Journal of periodontology.2005;76(10):1623-8. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1623]
2. Esposito M, Siormpas K, Mitsias M, Bechara S, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Pistilli R. Immediate, early (6 weeks) and delayed loading (3 months) of single implants: 4-month post-loading from a multicenter pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(3):249-60.
3. Ahmed H, Fathy A, Essam E. Effect of Different Types of Luting Cements on Retention and Marginal Adaptation of Implant-Supported Crowns (An in Vitro Study). Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls. 2017;4(1):13-21. [DOI:10.21608/adjg.2017.5191]
4. Rani S, Singh RK, Kundra S. Quantitative Estimation and Evaluation of Existing Knowledge, Attitude and Knowledge among Patients about Execution of Dental Implants: A Questionnaire Based Original Study. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2017;5(9):15-8.
5. Fakheran O, Moosaali F. Knowledge and knowledge of patients toward dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Kerman, Iran. Journal of Advanced Periodontology & Implant Dentistry. 2017;8(2):43-8. [DOI:10.15171/jpid.2016.008]
6. Edelmayer M, Woletz K, Ulm C, Zechner W, Tepper G. Patient information on treatment alternatives for missing single teeth Systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(Suppl 1):S45-S57.
7. Saha A, Dutta S, Vijaya V, Rajnikant N. Knowledge among patients regarding Implants as a treatment option for replacement of missing teeth in Chattisgarh. Journal of international oral health: JIOH. 2013;5(5):48.
8. Kohli S, Bhatia S, Kaur A, Rathakrishnan T. Trends in patients' mindset on dental implants: A survey in Malaysia. Journal of Dental Implants. 2014;4(1):33. [DOI:10.4103/0974-6781.130964]
9. Amri RA, Saker S. Dental Implants Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study of Patients' Knowledge and Knowledge. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2017:1-9 [DOI:10.9734/BJMMR/2017/30449]
10. Özçakır Tomruk C, Özkurt-Kayahan Z, Şençift K. Patients' knowledge and knowledge of dental implants in a Turkish subpopulation. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2014;6(2):133-7. [DOI:10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.133]
11. Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients' knowledge and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The Saudi dental journal. 2010;22(4):183-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.07.006]
12. Awooda EM, Eltayeb AS, Hussein SA, Dayelnaiem SI, Abdelhamied MA, Mohamed L, et al. Knowledge, attitude and acceptance of dental implants among patients attending Khartoum Dental Teaching Hospital. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2014;13(11):19-23. [DOI:10.9790/0853-131161923]
13. Jha A, Aher V, Lath P, et al. Knowledge and awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in the adult population in North India: A hospital-based study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021;12(2):244-249. doi:10.4103/njms.NJMS_38_20 [DOI:10.4103/njms.NJMS_38_20]
14. Satpathy A, Porwal A, Bhattacharya A, Sahu PK. Patient knowledge, acceptance and perceived cost of dental Implants as a treatment modality for replacement of missing teeth: A survey in Bhubaneswar and Cuttack. Int J PublicHealth Dent. 2011;2(1):1-7.
15. Dhir S, Mahesh L, Kurtzman GM, Vandana KL. Peri-implant and periodontal tissues: a review of differences and similarities. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(7):e69-75. PMID: 24428439.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
