Volume 10, Issue 2 (Apr- June 2021)                   JCHR 2021, 10(2): 112-116 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tay C L, Binti Abdul Wahab N A. Primary Care Doctors’ Role in Antenatal Detection and Management of Fetal Bilateral Pleural Effusions: A Report of 2 Cases. JCHR 2021; 10 (2) :112-116
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-664-en.html
1- 1. Simpang Health Clinic, District of Larut, Matang and Selama, Taiping, Perak, Ministry of Health Malaysia , chailitay.research@gmail.com
2- 2. Changkat Jering Health Clinic, District of Larut, Matang and Selama, Taiping, Perak, Ministry of Health Malaysia
Abstract:   (899 Views)
Introduction: Fetal pleural effusion is rarely seen in primary care setting. It is more commonly diagnosed among women with diabetes mellitus in pregnancy.
Method: This report illustrates two patients with fetal bilateral pleural effusions, detected at 18-week and 24-week period of amenorrhea (POA) during routine antenatal scans by primary care doctors.
Result: These two pregnancies were complicated with hydrops fetalis and resulted in fresh stillbirth and intra-uterine death.
Conclusion: Primary healthcare providers play an important role in the early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomaly, counseling regarding the ultrasonography findings, neonatal outcome, and referral to obstetrician for further management and monitoring for maternal complications, such as polyhydramnios, preeclampsia, mirror syndrome, and depression as a result of hydrops fetalis
Full-Text [PDF 647 kb]   (546 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (290 Views)  
Review: case report | Subject: Health care management
Received: 2020/07/31 | Accepted: 2021/03/20 | Published: 2021/07/1

References
1. Hidaka N, Chiba Y. Fetal hydrothorax resolving completely after a single thoracentesis: A report of 2 cases. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine.2007;52(9):843-8.
2. Longaker MT, Laberge J-M, Dansereau J, et al. Primary fetal hydrothorax: natural history and management. Journal of Pediatric Surgery.1989; 24(6):573-6. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3468(89)80509-3]
3. Rustico MA, Lanna M, Coviello D, et al. Fetal pleural effusion. Prenatal Diagnosis: Published in Affiliation With the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis .2007;27(9):793-9. [DOI:10.1002/pd.1768]
4. Lee KW, Ching SM, Ramachandran V, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.2018;18(1):1-20. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-018-2131-4]
5. Waller K, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Yamasmit W, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities among 246 fetuses with pleural effusions detected on prenatal ultrasound examination: factors associated with an increased risk of aneuploidy. Genetics in Medicine. 2005;7(6):417-21. [DOI:10.1097/01.GIM.0000170774.86075.12]
6. Yinon Y, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Chaddha V, et al. Perinatal outcome following fetal chest shunt insertion for pleural effusion. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2010;36(1):58-64. [DOI:10.1002/uog.7507]
7. Yinon Y, Kelly E, Ryan G. Fetal pleural effusions. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;22(1):77-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.09.004]
8. Nicolaides K, Azar G. Thoraco-amniotic shunting. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.1990;5(3-4):153-64. [DOI:10.1159/000263586]
9. Weber AM, Philipson EH. Fetal pleural effusion: a review and meta-analysis for prognostic indicators. Obstetrics and gynecology.1992;79(2):281-6.
10. Langlois S, Wilson RD, Pandya PP, et al. 36 - Fetal Hydrops. Fetal Medicine (Third Edition). London: Content Repository; 2020. p. 427-42.e2. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-7020-6956-7.00036-1]
11. Okai T, Baba K, Kohzuma S, et al. [Nonimmunologic hydrops fetalis: a review of 30 cases]. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi.1984;36(10):1813-21.
12. Hutchison AA, Drew JH, Yu VY, et al. Nonimmunologic hydrops fetalis: a review of 61 cases. Obstetrics and gynecology.1982;59(3):347-52.
13. Kaiser IH. Ballantyne and triple edema. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.1971;110(1):115-20. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(71)90226-2]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Community Health Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb