Volume 8, Issue 4 (Oct-Dec 2019)
JCHR 2019, 8(4): 211-219 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abbasishavazi M, Hajimohammadi B, Hajebrahimi Z. Predictors of Intention to Consume Genetically Modified Oil among Personnel of Community Health Care Centers in Yazd, Iran: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. JCHR 2019; 8 (4) :211-219
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-481-en.html
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-481-en.html
1- 1. Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , mabbasishavazi@gmail.com
2- 2. Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3- 3. Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- 2. Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3- 3. Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Abstract: (4015 Views)
Introduction: Genetically Modified (GM) food is a point of debate in the world. There have been few relevant studies in Iran, so this study aimed to predict the consumption of genetically modified oil by the staff of health centers based on the planned behavior theory.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 105 staff members of health care centers of Yazd in Iran completed a researcher-made questionnaire in 2017. The questionnaire validity and reliability were verified. The data were analyzed via SPSS 11.5, by Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression model. The data were analyzed using SPSS software and at the number below 0.05 regarded as significant.
Results: Attitudes and subjective norms had the strongest positive, significant correlations with consuming genetically modified oil (r=0.619, r=0.526, p<0.01) respectively. Predictors of consuming intent for genetically modified oil showed that 43.2% of the variance of intention was determined by the attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control.
Conclusion: Since the attitude was identified as the strongest predictor of consuming intention of genetically modified (GM) oil, studying the factors influencing the attitude toward GM food in different social levels of Iran is recommend. The results provide important evidence for supporting the use of this theory in predictions of food-related consumption behaviors, especially in the area of new food products
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 105 staff members of health care centers of Yazd in Iran completed a researcher-made questionnaire in 2017. The questionnaire validity and reliability were verified. The data were analyzed via SPSS 11.5, by Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression model. The data were analyzed using SPSS software and at the number below 0.05 regarded as significant.
Results: Attitudes and subjective norms had the strongest positive, significant correlations with consuming genetically modified oil (r=0.619, r=0.526, p<0.01) respectively. Predictors of consuming intent for genetically modified oil showed that 43.2% of the variance of intention was determined by the attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control.
Conclusion: Since the attitude was identified as the strongest predictor of consuming intention of genetically modified (GM) oil, studying the factors influencing the attitude toward GM food in different social levels of Iran is recommend. The results provide important evidence for supporting the use of this theory in predictions of food-related consumption behaviors, especially in the area of new food products
Keywords: Oil, Genetically Modified (GM) food, Attitudes, Consuming intention, Theory of planned behavior
Review: Research |
Subject:
Health education
Received: 2018/11/22 | Accepted: 2019/12/29 | Published: 2019/12/29
Received: 2018/11/22 | Accepted: 2019/12/29 | Published: 2019/12/29
References
1. Jacobsen SE, Sorensen M, Pedersen SM, et al. feeding the world: Genetically modified crops verses agricultural biodiversity. Agronomy Sustainable Developement. 2013; 33(4): 651-62. [DOI:10.1007/s13593-013-0138-9]
2. Paarlberg RL. The Real Threat to GM crops in poor countries: consumer and policy resistance to GM foods in rich countries .Food policy. 2002; 27(3): 247-50. [DOI:10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00014-3]
3. McEwen A, Straus L, Croker H. Dietary beliefs and behavior of a UK Somali Population.Journal of Human Nutrition Dietetics.2009;22: 116-21. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-277X.2008.00939.x]
4. Zhang D, Guo j. the Development and standardization of testing methods for genetically modified organisms and Drived Products.journal of integrative plant biology.2011;53(7): 539-51. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01060.x]
5. Tohidfar M, Khosravi S. Challenges for releasing BT transgenic plants. Journal Agricultural Biotechnology. 2015; 7(3): 33-54.[persian]
6. Magnusson MK, Hursti UKK. Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods.Appetite.2002; 39:9-24. [DOI:10.1006/appe.2002.0486]
7. Allahyari Frad N. A study of Islamic (Shia) views about consumption of genetically modified organisms products. Medical Ethics and History of medicine. 2013;6(1): 74-83 .[Persian]
8. BredahlL.Consumers Cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods, Results of qualitative Study in four countries. Appetite.1999; 33(3): 343-60. [DOI:10.1006/appe.1999.0267]
9. Gaskell G, Bauer MW, Durant J, et al. Worlds apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U. S. Science.1999; 285(5426): 384-7. [DOI:10.1126/science.285.5426.384]
10. Hoban Tj. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology: An international perspective. Nature biotechnology. 1997; 15(3): 232-4. [DOI:10.1038/nbt0397-232]
11. Onyango B. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: The Role of Product Benefits and Perceived Risks. Journal of Food Distribution research.2004; 35(1): 154-61.
12. Huang J, Qiu H, Bai J, et al. Awareness, acceptance and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China.Appetite.2006;46(2): 144-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2005.11.005]
13. Ghanian M, Ghoochani O, kitterlin M, et al .Attitudes of Agricultural Experts toward Genetically Modified Crops: A Case Study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics.2016; 2: 509-24.[Persian] [DOI:10.1007/s11948-015-9653-1]
14. Ghiasvand GF, Mirakzadeh Aa, Shiri N. Factors Affecting Consumer Attitudes towards Genetically Modified (GM) Crops (Case study: Qazvin County). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research.2015; 46(3): 427-38 .[Persian]
15. AbbasiShavazi M, Baghianimoghadam MH, Rezaeipandari H ,et al. Predictors of Using Respiratory Protection Masks among Workers of Sanitary Ware Companies in Yazd, Iran, Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior .Mazandaran University Medical Sciences.2017 ;27(151): 180-92. [Persian]
16. Ajzen I,Driver Bl .Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences.1991; 13 (3): 185-204. [DOI:10.1080/01490409109513137]
17. Delshad Noghabi A, Darabi F, Moshki M. The Impact of education on the basis of the theory of planned behavior on the level and method of supervision of their parents on watching television by students. Journal of Torbat Heydariyeh University of medical Siences. 2016; 30: 406. [Persian]
18. Godin G, KOKG. The theory of planned behavior: A review Its Application to healh related behaviors.American Jounal of Health Promotion.1996; 11(2): 87-98. [DOI:10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87]
19. Bredahl L. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food-results of a cross-national survey.Consumer Policy. 2001; 24(1): 23-61. [DOI:10.1023/A:1010950406128]
20. Chen MF, Li HL. The consumer's attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preferences.2007; 18(4): 662-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.10.002]
21. Kim YG, Jang SY, Kim AK. Application of the theory of planned behavior to genetically modified foods: Moderating effects of food technology neophobia.Food Research International.2014; 62: 947-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.057]
22. Zhang M, Liu GL. The Effects of consumer's subjective and objective knowledge on perceptions and attitude towards genetically modified foods: objective knowledge as a determinant.International journal of food science and technology.2015; 50(5): 1198-1205. [DOI:10.1111/ijfs.12753]
23. Costa-Font M, Gil M. Structural Equation Modelling of Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified (GM) Food in the Mediterranean Europe: A Cross Country Study. Food Quality and Preference. 2009; 20(6): 399-409. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.011]
24. Saher M, Lindeman M, Hursti UKK. Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods.Appetite.2006; 46(3): 324-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.015]
25. Naeemi A, Pezeshki rad Gh, Ghareyazi B. An investigation of biotechnology experts'Attitudes in Univesity Centers of Tehran Province towards the Use of Transgenic Plants. Environmental Sciences.2010; 7(2): 77-91. [Persian]
26. Yazdanpanah M, Forouzani M, Bakhtiyari Z. Investigating the Tendency of Khuzestan Province Organization of Agriculture Jihad Experts towards Genetically Modified Crops. Iranian Agricaltural Extension and Education journal.2016; 12(1): 103-17. [Persian]
27. French DP, Sutton S, Hennings SJ, et al. The importance of Affective beliefs and attitudes in the theory of planned behavior: Predicting intentions to increase physical activity. Journal of Applied socialphycology.2005; 35(9): 1824-48. [DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02197.x]
28. McConnon A, Raats M,AstrupA,et al. Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to weight control in an overweight cohort. Results from A pan - European dietary intervention trial (DiOGenes). Appetite.2012; 58(1): 313-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.017]
29. Morowaty MA, Chaleshgar M, Abbasi shavazi M, et al. Evaluation of workers-related factors about using of hearing protection devices in textile factories, based on planned behaviuor theory.Occupational Medicine quarterly journal research center of industry related diseases.2013;5(2): 32-42. [Persian]
30. Schifter De, Ajzen I. Intention, perceived control and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior.journal of personality and Social Psychology.1985; 49(3): 843-51. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843]
31. Kikulwe EM, Wesseler J, Falck-Zepeda J. Attitudes,perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.Appetite. 2011; 57(2): 401-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.001]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
