Volume 14, Issue 1 (1-2025)                   JCHR 2025, 14(1): 71-78 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hasanizadeh S, Varaee H, Mirjalili F, Najarzadeh A, Mirzaei M. The Effect of Hemoglobin and Body Mass Index on the Outcomes of COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study. JCHR 2025; 14 (1) :71-78
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-1100-en.html
1- 1. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran 2. Student Research Committee, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- 1. School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran 2. Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , hadis.varaee@gmail.com
3- 1. Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran 2. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
4- Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
5- Yazd Cardiovascular Research Centre, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 667 kb]   (196 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (887 Views)
Full-Text:   (12 Views)
The Association of Hemoglobin and Body Mass Index and the Outcomes of COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study
Shirin Hassanizadeh1,2 , Hadis Varaee 3,4 * , Fatemeh Sadat Mirjalili4,5 , Azadeh Nadjarzadeh 5 , Masoud Mirzaei 6
 
  1. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. Student Research Committee, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  4. Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  5. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  6. Yazd Cardiovascular Research Centre, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Original Article
Received: 15 Jan 2025
Accepted: 08 Apr 2025
Background: Previous studies indicated the risk factors for COVID-19. It is known that nutritional status is one of the main causes of immune system failure. This study aims to investigate the association of nutritional status and the outcomes of COVID-19 in participants of Yazd Health Study (YaHS).
Methods: 279 people who had taken a blood test before contracting COVID-19 were included in this study in 2022. Data of PO2 level, rate of hospitalization, "supplementation with oxygen" rate, BUN, and creatinine were extracted. Hemoglobin levels and body mass index (BMI) were also evaluated. The authors applied analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent sample t-test to show differences between levels of BMI and hemoglobin. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS version 22.0 software.
Results: The results showed a significant difference between hemoglobin levels and different BMI levels (P = 0.03). However, there was no significant relationship between different BMI levels and BUN (P = 0.34), creatinine (P = 0.42), BUN/Cr (P = 0.14), PO2 (P = 0.34), supplementation with oxygen (P = 0.26), and hospitalization rates (P = 0.97). The results according to the normal and abnormal hemoglobin levels were not significant.
Conclusion: According to the criteria used in this study to assess nutritional status (BMI and hemoglobin levels), there was no significant relationship between nutritional status (different levels of BMI and hemoglobin) and COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization rate, “supplementation with oxygen” rate, and low PO2 levels. Further studies in different countries using other nutritional status assessment tools are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: Body mass index, COVID-19, hemoglobin,  nutritional status



Corresponding Author:
Hadis Varaee
hadis.varaee@gmail.com
How to cite this paper:
Hassanizadeh Sh, Varaee H, Mirjalili F, Nadjarzadeh A, Mirzaei M. The Association of Hemoglobin and Body
Mass Index and the Outcomes of COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Community Health Research 2025; 14(1): 71-8.

Introduction
 
Considering the spread of COVID-19 from the beginning of its emergence and the resulting critical situation, many studies have been conducted with the aim of identifying risk factors for the severe form of COVID-19 (1). Currently, there is consensus on the main clinical risk factors for COVID-19. These include being 65 years and above, male (2), smoking tobacco (3), having comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2, 4), and obesity (5, 6). The effect of obesity on the severity of COVID-19 could be due to different mechanisms:
1) A higher baseline inflammatory state among obese individuals (7), which makes them more prone to generate a “cytokine storm,”
2) Lower respiratory capacity (8), which may increase disease severity,
3) Increased lipid peroxidation (9), and higher levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (-ACE2, a functional receptor for COVID-19) in adipose tissue (10, 11), which may act as a virus reservoir and activate immunity and strengthen cytokines (12).
On the other hand, malnutrition is considered the most important cause of immune system failure worldwide (13). In fact, at least four out of ten hospitalized patients (including the obese (14)) suffer from some forms of malnutrition (15). The rate of malnutrition increases with age (14) and in the presence of concomitant diseases (16). Malnutrition leads to increased hospital length of stay (LOS) (17, 18), hospital mortality (18, 19), and medical costs (19). However, the number of malnourished patients is often underestimated in hospitals, which has led to underreporting of this disease (20, 21). Studies have shown that extracting clinical data directly from electronic medical records (EMR) is more valuable than hospital data (discharge data) for estimating the prevalence of malnutrition (22). nutritional status of patients can be identified using various tools; more than 20 of these tools have been reported so far (23-25) some cases of which include:
1) Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST),
2) Short Nutrition Assessment (MNA),
3) Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)
4) Blood factors such as hemoglobin, albumin, BUN, and creatinine.
Malnutrition is a proven risk factor for severe pneumonia (26). Several studies have shown that pneumonia patients with malnutrition are at higher risk of ICU admission, longer hospital stay, and higher mortality (27). Malnutrition affects several metabolic systems and appears to be a pathogenic factor for COVID-19 (28). Figure 1 summarizes the possible mechanisms by which malnutrition can affect the body response to COVID-19 (28). Based on these elements, expert statements and practical guidelines have been published to help healthcare professionals identify at-risk patients and malnourished people with COVID-19 and guide the nutritional management of this population (29).
These observations suggest that nutritional status may affect the severity and outcomes of COVID-19. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the association of nutritional status based on BMI and hemoglobin levels and the outcomes of COVID-19 in a large population of Iranian adults.
 

Figure 1. Possible mechanisms of malnutrition as a risk factor for COVID-19
 
Methods
Study selection
Using data linkage with Yazd Central Lab database, information on blood tests of participants in Yazd Health Study (YaHS) in 2018 and 2019, including hemoglobin and CBC, was collected. The information of people infected with COVID-19 was also collected. About 1,600 adults infected with COVID-19 virus in the age range of 20-70 participating in the enrollment phase of YaHS were also assessed. Finally, all people who had taken a blood test before contracting COVID-19 were included in this study in 2022 (n = 279).
Data extraction
The interviewers (H.V, F.M) made phone interviews with the participants. Information related to CBC, BUN, Cr, BUN/Cr, PO2, supplementation with oxygen, and hospitalization rate were extracted from YaHS database. Furthermore, at the beginning of the study, the authors asked participants to go to the clinic to measure their weight, but the cooperation of participants were low, so they were asked to measure their weight themselves and inform the study team.
Diagnosis of COVID-19
COVID-19 has been diagnosed using real-time polymerase chain reaction tests or CT-Scan positive signs or diagnosis by physicians. In addition, the presence of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were evaluated in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who recovered from the virus.
Hemoglobin and Body Mass Index assessment
Hemoglobin and BMI of the participants in the study were assessed using data from the first stage of YaHS (BMI < 18.5, and anemia (Hb < 12 gr/dl in women and Hb < 13.5 gr/dl in men)).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS version 22.0 software. Descriptive results were expressed as the number of patients (%) for categorical variables and as median (interquartile range) or as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. This study used Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. In addition, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to show differences between levels of BMI.
Results
Study population characteristics
A summary of the characteristics of YaHS participants is shown in Table 1. In this study, 52.4% of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 49. The BMI mean value of the participants in the study was in the overweight range (27.9). The average levels of Hb, BUN, Cr, and Cr/BUN of the participants were in the normal range. The average percentage of PO2 of participants was 87.9%, and a small percentage of the participants were intubated (6.4%) or hospitalized (7.1%) (Table 1).
 


Table 1. Summary of the general characteristics of the participants in the enrollment phase of Yazd Health Study -YaHS (2014-2015) (n = 279)
Variables Mean±SD or number (percentage)
Sex (female) 140 (52.4%)
Age (year) 49.4 ± 12.9
BMI (kg/m2) 27.9 ± 4.9
PO2 87.9 ± 9.5
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 14.3 ± 1.7
 Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) 29.1 ± 9.0
 Creatinine (mg/dL)  1.1 ± 0.5
Blood urea nitrogen /Creatinine 27 ± 10.3
"Supplementation with oxygen" rate (%) 17 (6.4%)
 Hospitalization rate (%) 19 (7.1%)
Data were reported as mean and standard deviation or number (percentage). BMI: Body Mass Index
 
Comparison of biochemical parameters according to BMI
Table 2 presents the comparison of biochemical parameters based on BMI. The results showed a significant difference in Hb level based on different levels of BMI (P = 0.03). However, there was no significant relationship between different levels of BMI and BUN, Cr, BUN/Cr, PO2, supplementation with oxygen, and hospitalization rate.
 


Table 2. Comparison of biochemical parameters according to BMI in Yazd Health Study
Variables BMI ˂ 25
(n = 44)
25 ≤ BMI ˂ 30
(n = 87)
BMI ≥ 30
(n = 48)
P-values1
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 14.3 ± 2 14.7 ± 1.6 13.9 ± 2 0.03
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) 27.7 ± 8.2 30.1 ± 9.3 30.1 ± 10.7 0.34
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.10 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.3 0.42
BUN/Cr 25.5 ± 7.6 26.9 ± 7.9 29.8 ± 16.2 0.14
PO2 0.34
 < 80% 6 (21.4%) 5 (12.5%) 2 (8%)
≥ 80% 22 (78.6%) 35 (87.5%) 23 (92%)
"Supplementation with oxygen" rate (%) 0.26
 Yes 2 (4.9%) 6 (7.3%) 6 (14.3%)
No 39 (95.1%) 76 (92.7) 36 (85.7%)
Hospitalization rate (%) 0.97
Yes 3 (12.5%) 7 (11.3%) 3 (10.3%)
No 21 (87.5%) 55 (88.7%) 26 (89.7%)
BMI: Body Mass Index; BUN, Blood Urea Nitrogen
Data were reported as mean and standard deviation or number (percentage). P-value was calculated based on ANOVA or chi-square.
 
Comparison of biochemical and anthropometric parameters based on hemoglobin levels
Table 3 presents the comparison of biochemical and anthropometric parameters based on Hb levels. The results showed that there was no significant difference in BMI, Cr, BUN/Cr, PO2, supplementation with oxygen, and hospitalization rate based on normal and abnormal hemoglobin levels.
 

Table 3. Comparison of biochemical and anthropometric parameters according to hemoglobin levels in Yazd Health Study
Variables Abnormal levels of
hemoglobin (n = 22)
Normal level of
hemoglobin (n = 240)
P-value 1
BMI (kg/m2) 27.7 ± 6 27.93 ± 4.8 0.33
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) 25.6 ± 7.1 29.5 ± 9.1 0.66
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.6 0.54
BUN/Cr 24.8 ± 5.7 27.4 ± 10.6 0.18
PO2 0.54
< 80% 1 (10%) 19 (17.4%)
≥ 80% 9 (90%) 90 (82.6%)
"Supplementation with oxygen" rate (%) 0.65
 Yes 1 (5.9%) 17 (9.1%)
No 16 (94.1%) 170 (90.9%)
Hospitalization rate (%) 0.44
Yes 1 (5.3%) 13 (10.9%)
No 18 (94.7%) 106 (89.1%)
BMI: Body Mass Index; BUN, Blood Urea Nitrogen
Data were reported as mean and standard deviation or number (percentage). P-value was calculated based on the independent sample t-test or chi-square
 
Discussion
The results showed that the average hemoglobin level differed between different BMI levels, and the lowest level was in individuals with a BMI above 30 kg/m2. However, no significant difference was observed between the outcomes of COVID-19, such as supplementation with oxygen, low PO2 level, and hospitalization based on different levels of BMI and hemoglobin. It is well known that nutritional assessments play an important role in the health status of patients (30-32). Hence, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) provides practical guidelines for the nutritional management of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. According to ESPEN recommendations, the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malnutrition should be considered an integral part of the ongoing care of patients with COVID-19 (33).  In addition, a study showed that  among the hematological parameters, reduction in Hb is one of the dominant factors in COVID-19 patients (34).  The results of a study showed a link between a previous malnutrition diagnosis and severe COVID-19.  In this study, the effect of malnutrition on severe COVID-19 was the highest in younger children (less than 5 years) in the pediatric population (35).  A study in China showed that one-third (34%) of overweight patients were at risk of malnutrition. In this study, malnutrition was assessed using NRS-2002 score, and the findings indicated that a higher NRS-2002 score was associated with an increased LOS and greater disease severity (36). A study revealed that among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, a higher BMI was associated with a higher risk of severe organ failure or in-hospital death, which dissipates after adjustment for CRP level (37). Another study showed that obese patients were at a higher risk of severe development of SARS-CoV2 infection and associated mortality (38). The observed findings were due to the alteration of the body’s immune system due to malnutrition caused by excessive food consumption (obesity). Obesity induces an inflammatory state by altering TCD4 cell response, resulting in increased leptin production (39, 40) which is characterized by the reduction of effective and cytotoxic functions. Micronutrient deficiency is another issue in malnourished individuals, since vitamins and micronutrients play an important role in the proper functioning of innate and acquired immune responses (41, 42). Malnutrition combined with micronutrient deficiencies, excessive metabolism, and excessive nitrogen loss, predisposes individuals to infection and increases the associated outcomes (43). However, the results of previous studies were not in the same direction as the present study. One possible cause of the observed conflicting results could be attributed to the criteria used to evaluate the nutritional status in the study. Previous studies have shown the association of nutritional status and COVID-19 using screening and assessment tools of nutritional status CONUT, GNRI, NRS2000, and GLIM. Studies have also shown that biological markers are poor predictors of nutritional status, as they may be affected by critical illness, infection, and liver and kidney disease (44). Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further studies using other nutritional status evaluation criteria.
Strengths and limitation
The present investigation scrutinizes the association between nutritional standing based on hemoglobin and BMI levels and the severity of COVID-19 among adult inhabitants of Yazd Greater Area, Iran, using data from a large-scale prospective study (YaHS) that covered both urban and rural populations. However, this study entailed a certain limitation. The principal limitation of this study pertained to the criteria utilized for evaluating the nutritional status, as the authors were unable to employ NRS, NUTRIC, MUST, MNA, etc. criteria due to insufficient data. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further studies using other nutritional status assessment criteria. In addition, due to the study design, it was not possible to examine the causal relationship.

Conclusion
 There was no significant relationship between nutritional status (different levels of BMI and hemoglobin levels) and COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization rate, supplementation with oxygen rate, and low PO2 levels. However, more studies in different countries using other nutritional status assessment criteria should be conducted to confirm these findings.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the participants of Yazd Health study for their cooperation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interests.
Funding
This study was funded by the Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Ethical considerations
This project was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. Moreover, written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants.
Code of ethics
IR.SSU.REC.1399.131
Author contributions
Design and conception of the paper were done by, M. M and Sh. H; Data acquisition or analysis/ interpretation was conducted by, H. V, F. M. and Sh. H; Manuscript was drafted by, Sh. H, HV. MM and A. N, were engaged in revision of the manuscript; M. M, supervised the study and was responsible for the integrity and accuracy of all study data. Ultimately, the final version was read and approved by all the authors.
Open access policy
JCHR does not charge readers and their institution for access to its papers. Full text download of all new and archived papers are free of charge.



References
1. O'Neill LAJ, Netea MG. BCG-induced trained immunity: can it offer protection against COVID-19? Nat Rev Immunol. 2020; 20(6): 335-7.
2. Zheng Z, Peng F, Xu B, et al. Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020; 81(2): e16-e25.
3. Cattaruzza MS, Zagà V, Gallus S, et al. Tobacco smoking and COVID-19 pandemic: old and new issues. A summary of the evidence from the scientific literature. Acta Biomed. 2020; 91(2): 106-12.
4. Mehra MR, Desai SS, Kuy S, et al. Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(25): e102.
5. Lighter J, Phillips M, Hochman S, et al. Obesity in Patients Younger Than 60 Years Is a Risk Factor for COVID-19 Hospital Admission. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71(15): 896-7.
6. Cai Q, Chen F, Wang T, et al. Obesity and COVID-19 Severity in a Designated Hospital in Shenzhen, China. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(7): 1392-8.
7. Marques-Vidal P, Bochud M, Bastardot F, et al. Association between inflammatory and obesity markers in a Swiss population-based sample (CoLaus Study). Obes Facts. 2012; 5(5): 734-44.
8. Bokov P, Delclaux C. [The impact of obesity on respiratory function]. Rev Mal Respir. 2019; 36(9): 1057-63.
9. Petrakis D, Margină D, Tsarouhas K, et al. Obesity ‑ a risk factor for increased COVID‑19 prevalence, severity and lethality (Review). Mol Med Rep. 2020; 22(1): 9-19.
10.          Kruglikov IL, Scherer PE. The Role of Adipocytes and Adipocyte-Like Cells in the Severity of COVID-19 Infections. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020; 28(7): 1187-90.
11.          Engin AB, Engin ED, Engin A. Two important controversial risk factors in SARS-CoV-2 infection: Obesity and smoking. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020; 78: 103411.
12.          Ryan PM, Caplice NM. Is Adipose Tissue a Reservoir for Viral Spread, Immune Activation, and Cytokine Amplification in Coronavirus Disease 2019? Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020; 28(7): 1191-4.
13.          Katona P, Katona-Apte J. The interaction between nutrition and infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46(10): 1582-8.
14.          Imoberdorf R, Rühlin M, Beerli A, et al. Mangelernährung im Alter. Swiss Medical Forum ‒ Schweizerisches Medizin-Forum. 2014; 14.
15.          Correia M, Perman MI, Waitzberg DL. Hospital malnutrition in Latin America: A systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36(4): 958-67.
16.          Gomes F, Schuetz P, Bounoure L, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutritional support for polymorbid internal medicine patients. Clin Nutr. 2018; 37(1): 336-53.
17.          Bernard V, Noel J. Do inventory disclosures predict sales and earnings? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 1991; 6(2): 145-81.
18.          Leiva Badosam E, Badia Tahull M, Virgili Casas N, et al. Cribado de la desnutrición hospitalaria en la admisión: la desnutrición aumenta la mortalidad y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. Nutrición Hospitalaria. 2017; 34(4): 907-13.
19.          Khalatbari-Soltani S, Marques-Vidal P. Impact of nutritional risk screening in hospitalized patients on management, outcome and costs: A retrospective study. Clin Nutr. 2016; 35(6): 1340-6. [Persian]
20.          Khalatbari-Soltani S, Marques-Vidal P. Adherence to hospital nutritional status monitoring and reporting guidelines. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9): e0204000. [Persian]
21.          Khalatbari-Soltani S, de Mestral C, Waeber G, et al. Large regional disparities in prevalence, management and reimbursement of hospital undernutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019; 73(1): 121-31. [Persian]
22.          Khalatbari-Soltani S, Waeber G, Marques-Vidal P. Diagnostic accuracy of undernutrition codes in hospital administrative discharge database: improvements needed. Nutrition. 2018; 55-56: 111-5. [Persian]
23.          Leij-Halfwerk S, Verwijs MH, van Houdt S, et al. Prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition risk in European older adults in community, residential and hospital settings, according to 22 malnutrition screening tools validated for use in adults ≥65 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2019; 126: 80-9.
24.          Dent E, Hoogendijk EO, Visvanathan R, et al. Malnutrition Screening and Assessment in Hospitalised Older People: a Review. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019; 23(5): 431-41.
25.          Power L, Mullally D, Gibney ER, et al. A review of the validity of malnutrition screening tools used in older adults in community and healthcare settings - A MaNuEL study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018; 24: 1-13.
26.          Yeo HJ, Byun KS, Han J, et al. Prognostic significance of malnutrition for long-term mortality in community-acquired pneumonia: a propensity score matched analysis. Korean J Intern Med. 2019; 34(4): 841-9.
27.          Falcone M, Russo A, Gentiloni Silverj F, et al. Predictors of mortality in nursing-home residents with pneumonia: a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018; 24(1): 72-7.
28.          Briguglio M, Pregliasco FE, Lombardi G, et al. The Malnutritional Status of the Host as a Virulence Factor for New Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020; 7: 146.
29.          Barazzoni R, Bischoff SC, Breda J, et al. ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Nutr. 2020; 39(6): 1631-8.
30.          Hejazi N, Mazloom Z, Zand F, et al. Nutritional assessment in critically ill patients. Iranian journal of medical sciences. 2016; 41(3): 171. [Persian]
31.          Ahmed T, Haboubi N. Assessment and management of nutrition in older people and its importance to health. Clinical interventions in aging. 2010: 207-16. [Persian]
32.          Shamlan G, Albreiki M, Almasoudi HO, et al. Nutritional status of elderly patients previously ill with COVID-19: Assessment with nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and mini nutritional assessment (MNA-sf). Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2024; 17(2): 372-7.
33.          Barazzoni R, Bischoff SC, Breda J, et al. ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Elsevier; 2020; 1631-8.
34.          Mojtahedi SS, Zarrinfar H, Bakhshaee M. Hematological Indices in COVID-19 Patients with Rhinosinusitis Mucormycosis. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 36(2): 399-405. [Persian]
35.          Kurtz A, Grant K, Marano R, et al. Long-term effects of malnutrition on severity of COVID-19. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11(1): 14974.
36.          Barazzoni R, Bischoff SC, Krznaric Z, et al. ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Elsevier; 2020.
37.          Phillips T, Mughrabi A, Garcia LJ, et al. Association of Body Mass Index with Multiple Organ Failure in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2024; 39(8): 768-77.
38.          Mancin S, Bertone A, Cattani D, et al. Malnutrition risk as a negative prognostic factor in COVID-19 patients. Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2021; 45: 369-73.
39.          Procaccini C, De Rosa V, Galgani M, et al. Leptin-induced mTOR activation defines a specific molecular and transcriptional signature controlling CD4+ effector T cell responses. The Journal of Immunology. 2012; 189(6): 2941-53.
40.          Kiernan K, Nichols AG, Alwarawrah Y, et al. Effects of T cell leptin signaling on systemic glucose tolerance and T cell responses in obesity. PLoS One. 2023; 18(6): e0286470.
41.          Mora JR, Iwata M, Von Andrian UH. Vitamin effects on the immune system: vitamins A and D take centre stage. Nature reviews immunology. 2008; 8(9): 685-98.
42.          Gombart AF, Pierre A, Maggini S. A review of micronutrients and the immune system–working in harmony to reduce the risk of infection. Nutrients. 2020; 12(1): 236.
43.          Briguglio M, Pregliasco FE, Lombardi G, et al. The malnutritional status of the host as a virulence factor for new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Frontiers in Medicine. 2020; 7: 146.
44.          Bedock D, Lassen PB, Mathian A, et al. Prevalence and severity of malnutrition in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2020; 40: 214-9.
 
Review: Research | Subject: Epidemiology
Received: 2025/01/15 | Accepted: 2025/04/8 | Published: 2025/05/4

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Community Health Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb