|
Modeling the Structural Relationships of Attachment Styles with Readiness for Addiction with the Mediation Cognitive Regulation of Emotion in Addicts Who Are Quitting |
|
Mahnaz Elahinezhad 1 * , Hossein Ebrahimi Moghadam 1
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Social Sciences, Roudhen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudhen, Iran
ARTICLE INFO |
|
ABSTRACT |
Original Article
Received: 11 Dec 2023
Accepted: 02 Apr 2024 |
|
Background: This research aimed to model the structural relationships of attachment styles with for addiction readiness with mediating variable cognitive regulation of emotion in quitting drug addicts.
Methods: This is an analytical-cross-sectional study. The sample included 300 rehabilitated addicts (18 to 55 years old) were selected from 4 addiction treatment centers in Amol city in 1401 using stratified random sampling. The tools used in this research were the questionnaire on attachment styles, readiness for addiction,cognitive regulation of emotions. Data analysis was perfprmed based on structural equation modeling in Amos 22 software.
Results: The findings manifested that attachment styles affect addiction readiness with the mediating variable being cognitive regulation of emotions in recovering addicts (P = 0.006, P = 0.0001). Attachment styles were directly related to the cognitive regulation of emotions in recovering addicts
(P = 0.0001). Cognitive regulation of excitement had a direct association with readiness for addiction in drug addicts who are quitting (P = 0.0001).
Conclusion:The results can beapplied in the interventions and trainings of addiction treatment clinics with regard to the predictive power of variables.
Keywords: Attachment styles, addiction, emotional regulation |
|
|
|
Corresponding Author:
Mahnaz Elahinezhad
mahnazelahinejad@yahoo.com
|
How to cite this paper:
Elahinezhad M, Ebrahimi Moghadam H. Modeling the Structural Relationships of Attachment Styles with Readiness for Addiction with the Mediation Cognitive Regulation of Emotion in Addicts Who Are Quitting. J Community Health Research 2024; 13(1): 69-76.
Introduction
The phenomenon of drug abuse is considered as one of the most serious social problems worldwide. Statistics and evidence indicate an increase of addiction in recent decades. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), approximately 5.6% (275 million individuals) of the world's population aged 15 to 64 were drug consumers in 2018. Furthermore, deaths caused by drug use are on the rise, with statistics uncovering a 60% increase worldwide between 2000 and 2015 (1). An individual's attitude about drugs is a type of thinking which can be rational or irrational. This type of attitude is frequentlyunconscious and permanent, inducing it complicated to change. Examining attitudes and creating a negative attitude about addiction is one stategy to assisst addicts understand themselves (2).
The thoughts and attitudes of addicted individuals drive them touse repeatedlyorto abstain permanently. Researchers have cited various reasons, including peer pressure, rebellion against parents, escape from life's uncertainties, emotional turmoil, alienation, or rejection by others (3). Life history, attachment styles, and personality characterisrics are effective in addiction. As mentioned earlier, one important factor that can significantly influence an individual's attitude towards addiction is their attachment style (4). Attachment styles can play a substatial role in the development of addiction, involving addiction to cigarettes, drugs, alcohol, and the Internet (5).
Attachment theory explains the process of forming an emotional bond between an infant and its mother and exhibited that forming such a bond and experiencing security within this framework is the basis for transformation and adaptation in unafflicted individuals (6). On the other hand, attachmentinsecurity is characterized by distrust, vulnerability, sensitivity, and communication problems. According to attachment theory, humans are biologically predisposed to form strong bonds with other humans which provide emotional support and protection (7). Three attachment styles have been identified: secure attachment, avoidant attachment, and anxious/ambivalent attachment.
Secure individuals readily seek help from others andaffirm the situation, whereas avoidant individuals reveal excessive sensitivity to negative emotions and attachment figures, making self-reliance a barrier for them (8). Ina study entitled "The Effect of Anxious and Avoidant Attachment on Preparation for Drug Addiction with the Mediating Role of Attitude towards Drugs," Hamednia, Panaghi, Habibi, and Mokhtarnia (2016) concluded that anxious and avoidant attachment to parents has a significant positive relationship with an attitude towards drugs and preparation for addiction. In addition, anxious and avoidant attachment to parents had a significant positive relationship with prepration for addiction through an attitude about drugs (9).
Besharat, Noorbakhsh, Rostami, and Farahani (2012) demonstrated in their research entitled "The Moderating Role of Self-regulation in the Relationship between Attachment Styles and the Severity of Substance Use Disorders" that secure attachment style has a positive relationship with self-regulation and the severity of the disorder. There is a negative association between substance use disorders and insecure attachment styles (avoidant and ambivalent), which had a negative relationship with self-regulation and a positive relationship with the severity of substance use disorders.
According to attachment theory, self-vulnerability is the result of developmental failures and early deprivation which result in dysfunctional attachment styles. Substances, as a compensatory effort, only lead to an aggravation of the situation through dependence and further deterioration of psychological and physiological structures (10). One of the substantial factors affecting substance abuse is the cognitive regulation of emotion. Emotional cognitive regulation implies the use of thoughts and behaviors that affect human emotions, and the meaning of cognitive emotion regulation is the way a person cognitively processes when faced with unfortunate and stressful events (Tang, 2016). According to researchers, individuals utilize various strategies when faced with stressful situations (11). The results of many researchers including Basharpour (2012), Wu (2015), and Steiner and Van Waes (2013) disclose that the cognitive regulation of emotion is related to readiness and susceptibility to addiction. On the other hand, the psyches of organisms are like software versions of behaviors that change with the help of gaining experience or insight (12).
Cessation of drug use is one of the issues that has always concerned the authorities, the drug abusers themselves and their families. Physical withdrawal from drugs is not extremely complicated, therefore the main problem is to return and initiate again this bad habit. Currently, , there are no accurate statistics on the percentage of the treated persons return to drugs in Iran, but the number of drug addicts is increasing. Country's drugs can indicate that the treatment methods performed yet, have not been successful or comprehensive, regarding the regional differences in the thoughts, beliefs, and persons' opinions, the opinions of individuals suffering from drug abuse in any geographical region can be an effective way of knowing the causes of relapse among addicts of that region. Various types of research have separately identified the role of research variables in addiction susceptibility, however, the direct and indirect relationship of these factors with readiness for addiction has been less studied. By examining this research, more appropriate intervention and treatment programs can be developed. Finally, the main question of the current research is whether attachment styles influence addiction readiness through the mediation of cognitive emotion regulation in recovered addicts?
Based on the research objectives, the following hypotheses are tested:
Main hypothesis: There is a relationship between attachment styles and addiction readiness through the mediation of cognitive regulation of emotions in addicts who quit.
- Attachment styles are directly related to addiction readiness in recovering addicts
- Attachment styles have a direct relationship with the cognitive regulation of emotions in addicts who are quitting
- Cognitive regulation of emotions is directly associated with addiction readiness in drug addicts who are quitting
Methods
This is an analytical-cross-sectional research. The statistical population included the addicts in recovery for 1 to 12 months, aged between 18 and 55years in 1401. They were selected from 4 addiction treatment centers in Iran, Amol. The sample size was calculated according to Cochran's formula with p = q = 0.5, d = 0.05, α = 5% and z = 1.96. Using stratified sampling (based on the number of individuals in 4 addiction treatment centers in Amal city), 300 questionnaires were personallydistributed bythe researchers among addicts with drug rehabilitation.
The data analysis method is was based on structural equation modeling, particularlystructural regression equations (a combination of path analysis and factor analysis), a covariance-based approach according to Amos software. This approach estimated path coefficients and factor loadings by minimizing the difference between thesample-based covariance matrix and the model-based covariance matrix.
Measuring tool
Addiction potential scale (IAPS): The scale of susceptibility to addiction was developed by Wade and Butcher, McKenna, and Ben Poras (1992). The used version is the Iranian susceptibility scale created by Zargar et al. It includes 36 items and 5 lie detector items. Each item is scored from 0 (stronglydisagree) to 3 (strongly agree). The totalscore is the sum of the individual scores (except for lie detector questions). The score ranges from 0 to 108, with higher scores revealing that the respondent was more prone to addiction.
Attachment styleQuestionnaire: Hazan and Shaver's (1987) attachment style test materials, it was made and standardized for Tehran University students. It includes 15 questions and three attachment styles: secure, avoidant, and ambivalent. The answers are presented on a 5-point Likert scale (1 strongly disagree to 5 agree). The avoidant style questions range from 1 to 5, safe style from 6 to 10, and the ambidextrous style from 11 to 15. The minimum and maximum scores in the subscales are 5 and 25. In Besharat's research (2000), the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the safe, avoidant, and ambivalent subscales for a student sample (1480 individuals including 860 girls and 620 boys) were reported to be 0.86, 0.84, 0.85 respectively (for female students 0.86, 0.83, 0.84 and male students 0.84, 0.85, 0.86). Kendall's coefficient of concordance (validity) for secure, avoidant, and ambivalent attachment styles were reported as 0.80, 0.61, and 0.75, respectively. In the present study, Cronbach's alpha was obtained in safe, avoidant, and ambivalent subscales as 0.73, 0.71, and 0.78 respectively.
Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ):The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire was developed by Granfsky, Kraij and Spinhaven (2001), which contains 36 items. I t is scored on a five-point Likert scale from never to always. It consists of seven subscales of self-blame, other-blame, catastrophizing, rumination, refocusing on planning, acceptance, positive focus, and positive evaluation. The alpha coefficient for the subscales was reported by Granfsky et al. (2002) to be in the range of 0.71 to 0.81.
Results
The diagram of the structural equation model tested to verify the research hypotheses for the standard estimation mode and the significance mode is illustrated in the following figures.
The results of the research hypotheses test
Structural equation model and Sobel test applied to investigate this hypothesis. Table 1 reveals the results of the fitted model to check the research hypotheses.
Table 1. Estimation of the coefficients of the structural equation model related to the research hypotheses
Sig |
Test statistics |
Estimation error |
Coefficient
Standard |
Coefficient |
Dependent |
Independent |
0.0001 |
-5.729 |
1.45 |
-0.733 |
8.310- |
Readiness for
Addiction |
Attachment Styles |
0.0001 |
8.371 |
0.047 |
0.425 |
0.392 |
Cognitive regulation of emotion |
Attachment Styles |
0.0001 |
-6.437 |
3.185 |
-0.720 |
-20.492 |
Readiness for
addiction |
Cognitive regulation of emotion |
Figure 1. Structural equation model in the standard estimation mode
Based on the results of Table 1, it can beobserved that the test statistics related to the examined relationships are greater than the critical value of 0.05 (t = 1.96, 0.95), and as a result, their significance can be accepted. To investigate the role of a mediator, Sobel's test was utilized. The relevant test results are demonstrated in Table 2.
Table 2. The results of the Sobel test
Sig |
z-value |
Sb |
Sa |
b |
a |
Mediator |
0.0001 |
-5.092 |
3.185 |
0.047 |
-20.482 |
0.392 |
Cognitive regulation of emotion |
Based on the obtained result, the mediating effect of cognitive regulation of emotions in the influence of attachment styles on addiction readiness, the z-value is greater than 1.96 and the significance level is less than 0.05. On this basis, attachment styles on readiness for addiction are mediated by cognitive regulation of emotions in recovering addicts. There is an effect.
Discussion
According to the obtained results, it has been confirmed that "attachment styles influencet addiction readiness by mediating cognitive regulation of emotions in addicts who quit." Based on the studies conducted, the resultsof this research are consistent with the findings of Basharpour (2012), Besharat et al. (2011), Wu (2015), and Steiner and Van Waes (2013). To explain the results of this hypothesis, it can be percieved that an individual's attachment level to those surrounding them influences their tendency to comply withapproval requests. For instance, a person who prioritizes pleasing their close friendsin order to maintain the position in the friend group may initiate consuming drugs if they areusing. When a person manage their attachment effectively, they can make wiser decisions in vulnerable and abnormal circumstances, and they do not believe that rejecting their loved one's wishes will diminish their intimacy level or dependence on them.
Individuals experience various emotions in their daily lives, and the absence of ability to cognitively manage emotions can put a person in a position to indulge in unconventional behaviors and harmful tendencies, including drug addiction, due to attachment to others.
Furthermore, the results confirmed that "attachment styles bear a direct relationship with addiction readiness in recovering addicts". In other words, with the changes in attachment styles, a person's readiness for addiction also changes.
Addicted persons who quit while using drugs find a kind of attachment to drugs according to John Bowlby's theory, when these persons are pressured to consume drugs, weak management of their emotions increases the risk of drug abuse. On the contrary, effective management of emotions is dangerouswhich reduces substance abuse. In order to justify the results of this hypothesis, it can be discussed that a person's attachment style will be the basis of his personal and social behaviors. If a person is addicted to drugs, it will play a role in preparing him for addiction.
According to Balbi's theory, during the early years of person's development, based on their experiences with attachment figures and interaction with the material world, they create their inner active patterns. With regard to these patterns, a person perceives and interprets, predicts events, and builds plans (Hazan and Shiver, 1987). Attachment theory assumes that these active models are communication schemas formed as a result of the rules present in interactions with the original attachment manifestations, and it is inferred that attachment models are associated with old cognitive schemas or beliefs. We have an intimate relationship with ourselves and others which affects and is affected by interpersonal interactions. Consequently, the origin of the emergence of attachment styles and initially incompatible schemas lies in the child's experiences formed in the relationship with caregivers.
On the other hand, it was confirmed that "attachment styles have a direct relationship with the cognitive regulation of emotions in quitting addicts." In other words, with the modifications in attachment styles, the ways of cognitive regulation associated with the individual's emotions change as well. To explain the results of this hypothesis, it can bepresented that a person's attachment styles are considered varioust in different life situations, and addicts who are quitting require to transform their attachment style with regard to the change in their addiction status. Several factors can result in emotional problems for addicts who are quitting. Factors that originate from individuals'personalityand characteristicsas well asthe novel environment . The process of cognitive emotion regulation consists of all conscious and unconscious strategies which an individual utilizes to increase, maintain, or decrease one or more components of an emotional response, including experiential, behavioral, and physiological. Therefore, a modification in a person's emotional response in various situations will be observed by modifying the attachment style.
Moreover, the results revealed that "cognitive regulation of emotionbears a direct relationship with readiness for addiction in recovering addicts". In other words, with changes in the cognitive regulation of emotions, the level of readiness of a person for addiction changesas well. To explain the results of this hypothesis, it can be determined that addiction, as one of the high-risk behaviors, includes a wide range of underdeveloped, pleasure-seeking behaviors, and is generally associated with high levels of risk, which can affect the way of managing one's emotions. Addictswho are quit to control their emotions no longer use the methods they applied to control the emotions during addiction period, and in general, the type of emotions which a person experiences after addiction is distinct from the time prior to it. The correct cognitive regulation of emotions after quitting addiction will play an important role in re-orientation of the person in preparation for addiction and in a case the person cannot regulate his emotions well, he will return to addiction and his lack of emotional peace and stability in He thinks it is the result of not taking drugs. Therefore, there is a relationship between the cognitive regulation of emotion and readiness for addiction.
Addictswho are quitting while using drugs detect a type of addiction to drugs based on John Bowlby's theory, when people are pressured to use drugs, poor management of their emotions intensifies the risk of drug abuse. conversely, efficient management of emotions is hazardouswhich reduces substance abuse. The explanation for the results of this hypothesis is that a person's attachment style will be the basis of many personal and social behaviors. If a person is a drud addict, it will play a role in preparing him to become addicted.
Conclusions
The results of this research indicatedthatit is possible to utilize the results of these variables' effects in interventions and training in addiction treatment clinics according to the predictive power of cognitive emotion regulation variable in the effect of attachment styles on readiness for addiction.
Suggestions
According to the obtained results, the following suggestions are provided:
- Cultivating conscious attention in addicted patients can be a method to increase trust in treatment and thus improve addiction. To achieve this goal, patients with insecure attachment anxiety in their close relationships should be encouraged to express the problems they experienced in the relationships. It is thereforerecommended that attachment styles are regarded as assessing problems with emotion regulation. Patients should percieve that treating patients with severe insecurity due to anxious attachment may compromise the effectiveness of treatment.
- To reduce the addictive tendency of recovering addicts, more attention should be paid to the category of cognitive regulation of emotions, It is possible to prohibit the relapse in drug addicts by training in the field of emotion management and regulation, emotional self-awareness, and behavioral counseling to individuals undergoing treatment in addiction treatment centers.
- It is recommanded that the addiction prevention programme should include teachingabout the compromised strategies and how to manage the cognitive regulation of emotions in order to prevent avoid persons from progressing towards addiction.
Acknowledgments
As this article is not an intervention, it does not have a code of ethics.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Ethical considerations
In the present study, the following ethical principles were considered for the participants: Informed and voluntary consent to participate in research. Having the right to withdraw from research. Non-disclosure of research information without the consent of the participants. Protecting participants' privacy and confidentiality Avoid harm to participants. Accepting the loss or losses resulting from participation in the research
Code of ethics
IR.IAU.BABOL.REC.1402.087
Authors’ contributions
H. EB, M. E; contributed to the design and implementation of the research, R. D; contributed to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript
Open access policy
Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, crawl for indexing or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the author.
References
- Eslami-Jahromi M, Keshvardoost S, Ershad-Sarabi R, et al. Information Needs of Addicted Individuals: A Qualitative Case Study. Addict Health. 2021; 13(3): 138-47. [Persian]
- Narod SA. Which Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer? N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(5): 471-473.
- Hu C, Hart SN, Gnanaolivu R, et al. A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(5): 440-451.
- Foulkes WD. The ten genes for breast (and ovarian) cancer susceptibility. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021; 18(5): 259-260.
- Arts-de Jong M, De Bock GH, Van Asperen CJ, et al. Germline BRCA1/2 mutation testing is indicated in every patient with epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2016; 61: 137-4.
- Speight B, Tischkowitz M. When to Consider Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers with Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer: a Case Study Illustrating the Genetic Counseling Challenges. J Genet Couns. 2017; 26(6): 1173-1178.
- Shi H, You Z, Guo Y. (Mutation of breast cancer susceptibility gene in ovarian cancer and its clinical significance). Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1998; 33(11): 676-8.
- Konstantinopoulos PA, Norquist B, Lacchetti C, et al. Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38(11): 1222-1245.
- Basharat M, Noorbakhsh S, Rostami R, et al. The moderating role of self-regulation in the relationship between attachment styles and severity of substance use disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2019; 4(3): 21-32. [Persian]
- Arghabaei M, Solimanian A A, Mohammadipoor M, et al. The role of attachment style in substance use tendency: Investigating the mediating role of sense of coherence. etiadpajohi. 2019; 13(53): 97-118.
- Tabibnia G, Creswell JD, Kraynak TE, et al. Common prefrontal regions activate during self-control of craving, emotion, and motor impulses in smokers. Clinical Psychological Science. 2014; 2(5): 611-9. 10.1177/2167702614522037.
- Perez-Dandieu B, Lenoir H, Othily E, et al. The impact of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and schema therapy on addiction severity among a sample of French women suffering from PTSD and SUD. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2015; 100(146): e68-9.
- Steiner H, Van Waes V. Addiction-related gene regulation: Risks of exposure to cognitive enhancers vs. other psychostimulants. Progress in neurobiology. 2013; 100: 60-80.
- Weed NC, Butcher JN, McKenna T, Ben-Porath YS. New measures for assessing alcohol and drug abuse with the MMPI-2: The APS and AAS. Journal of personality assessment. 1992; 58(2): 389-404.
- Wu L, Winkler MH, Wieser MJ, et al. Emotion regulation in heavy smokers: experiential, expressive and physiological consequences of cognitive reappraisal. Frontiers in psychology. 2015; 6: 155544.