Volume 10, Issue 2 (Apr- June 2021)
JCHR 2021, 10(2): 100-102 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bahariniya S, Ezatiasar M, Madadizadeh F. A Brief Review of the Types of Validity and Reliability of scales in Medical Research. JCHR 2021; 10 (2) :100-102
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-722-en.html
URL: http://jhr.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-722-en.html
1- Department of Health Services Management, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , sajjadbahari98@gmail.com
2- 2. School of Public Health, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
3- Center For Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School Of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
2- 2. School of Public Health, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
3- Center For Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School Of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Abstract: (1957 Views)
Dear Editor in Chief
Reliability and validity are concepts used to evaluate the quality of psychometric properties of a scale in medical research. Reliability is related to reproducibility, and validity is related to the accuracy of a scale. It is important to check reliability and validity when using a scale or questionnaire. The present study provides a brief overview of the types of validity and reliability in medical research.
Reliability and validity are concepts used to evaluate the quality of psychometric properties of a scale in medical research. Reliability is related to reproducibility, and validity is related to the accuracy of a scale. It is important to check reliability and validity when using a scale or questionnaire. The present study provides a brief overview of the types of validity and reliability in medical research.
Keywords: There is no Keywords.
Review: Letter to The Editor |
Subject:
Epidemiology
Received: 2021/01/2 | Accepted: 2021/03/20 | Published: 2021/07/1
Received: 2021/01/2 | Accepted: 2021/03/20 | Published: 2021/07/1
References
1. 1. Carson SH, Peterson JB, Higgins DM. Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity research journal. 2005;17(1):37-50. [DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4]
2. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report. 2003;8(4):597-607.
3. Anselmi P, Colledani D, Robusto E. A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Frontiers in psychology. 2019;10:2714. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714]
4. Holden RR. Face validity. The corsini encyclopedia of psychology. 2010:1-2. [DOI:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341]
5. Beckstead JW. Content validity is naught. International journal of nursing studies. 2009;46(9):1274-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.014]
6. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975;28(4):563-75. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x]
7. Brown JD. What is construct validity. Available at jalt. org/test/bro_8. htm (accessed 10 June 2013). 2000.
8. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report. 2003;8(4):597-607.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
