Volume 8, Issue 3 (Jul- Sep 2019)                   JCHR 2019, 8(3): 164-176 | Back to browse issues page

DOI: 10.18502/jchr.v8i3.1567

XML Persian Abstract Print

1- Health Policy and Management Research Center, Department of Management and Health Services , School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- Department of Management and Health Services , School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3- Research Center of Prevention and Epidemiology of Non-Communicable Disease, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (2122 Views)
Introduction: Recently, the health care sector has been moved towards establishing non-governmental organizations (NGOs); since collaborative approaches are more in these organizations and they provide better services. Hospitals and charity clinics are part of NGOchr('39')s. These organizations are affected by collaborative management. This collaboration has been conducted in a variety of ways, requiring the investigation of a study with the aim of providing a management pattern of health benefactors’ collaboration in medical sciences universities of Iran..
Methodology: This is a qualitative and Delphi study conducted in 2017. The study population was all of 13 universities out of 57 universities of medical sciences in Iran which the questionnaire was sent. To obtain experts’ opinion and consensus, using Delphi technique, a questionnaire with initial classifications and subclasses was electronically sent to the social deputy of the universities of medical sciences for three times. Eventually, out of the 13 universities, 10 people collaborated in the Delphi model. The sample of all 13 medical sciences universities in the country that participated in this study was divided into type 1, type 2 and type 3. In order to ensure the consistency of the experts, their responses were analyzed by Kendall correlation analysis in 5 phases, including1. Investigating documents, 2. Determining the type and defining components, 3. Questionnaire results and data collection by using descriptive statistics and excel software, 4. Delphi technique, 5. Suggested pattern. SPSS and Excel software were used to analyze the data.
Results: The findings of this study showed that the factors affecting the participation of the benefactors in the medical sciences universities of Iran include: holding meetings in the beginning of the academic year of the universities, holding meetings in special timeframe, and using benefactors’ financial resources in the research field. The results of Kendall coefficient indicate that by completing the response process from the first to the third stage, the agreement and community opinions were received and analyzed as acceptable, so that the Kendall coefficient was 61% in the first stage. By improving the questionnaire in the second stage, the Kendall coefficient reached 86%, and in the third stage of validation increased to 91%.
Conclusion: According to the results, the factors affecting the organization of health benefactors in medical universities of the country include: 1. Charity hospitals 2. Activated beds, 3. Charity organizations in cities, 4. A new approach to communicate with the university, and 5. Medical and research priorities in benefactors’ collaboration in the university medical sciences that explain an appropriate collaborative management pattern. The management pattern of collaboration can be used to improve the management of health benefactors’ collaboration in Iran Universities of Medical Sciences, and the highest priority to improve its performance depends on the organization and guidance among its members.
Full-Text [PDF 764 kb]   (392 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (79 Views)  
Review: Research | Subject: Health education
Received: 2019/03/12 | Accepted: 2019/07/27 | Published: 2019/10/2

1. BaharShabani G, Eiman M, Godarzi M, Honari H. Development of Structural Equation Models of Participative Management and Organizational Agility in Selected Iranian Sports Federations. Applied Research in Sport Management 2016;16(1):11-24. Persian
2. Hillis V, Lubell M, Hoffman M. Sustainability partnerships and viticulture management in California. Journal of Environmental Management 2018; 217:214-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.033]
3. Singh R, Baird A, Mathiassen L. Collaboration risk management in IT-enabled asymmetric partnerships: Evidence from telestroke networks. Information and Organization 2018; 28(4):170-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.10.001]
4. Nastizaee N, Abili Kh, Naderi A, OreyYazdani B. The Relationship of Collaborative Management with the Organizational Spirituality and Organizational Self-esteem of School Managers and Teachers of Zahedan City. Quarterly Journal Of Educational Leadership & Administration 2014; 8(1): 9-23. Persian
5. Koontz TM, Thomas CW. Use of science in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from local watershed partnerships in the Puget Sound. Environmental Science & Policy 2018; 88:17-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.007]
6. PezhmanFarh H. The Impact of Participatory Leadership Style on the Entrepreneurship of Governmental Organizations-Shavour Education and Education, Master's Degree in Educational Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran South Branch; 2015. Persian
7. Wilmer H, Derner JD, Fernández-Giménez ME, et al. Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management Fosters Management-Science Partnerships. Rangeland Ecology & Management 2018; 71(5):646-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.rama.2017.07.008]
8. Hosni Shelmani M. The Impact of School Administrator Participation on Programs and Duties of Participation of the Private-Governmental Sector. Education 2016, 126 (1): 47-68.
9. Robbins SP, Judge TA. Organizational Behavior. 13 Three Edition. USA: Pearson International Edition, Prentice-Hall; 2009.
10. Morrow PC, McElroy JC,Scheibe KP. Influencing organizational commitment through office redesign. Journal of Vocational Behavior.2012.81(1), 99-111. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.05.004]
11. Hermens N, Verkooijen KT, Koelen MA. Associations between partnership characteristics and perceived success in Dutch sport-for-health partnerships. Sport Management Review. 2019;22(1):142-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.smr.2018.06.008]
12. Ramezanian MR, Abdollahian F, Safardost A. Investigating the dimensions of managers' tendency toward participatory decision making and their impact on organizational commitment: Case study in service organizations of Guilan province. Journal of Improvement 2013; (19):86-109. Persian
13. Sobhaninejad M, Omidi M, Najafi H. Strategies for Managing Participatory Management in Universities Based on Islamic Foundations.Cultural Engineering 2015;(84):106-127. Persian
14. Imani J, ForjianNejad Gh. Study of the role of social interactivity in relation to participatory management and organizational development of Bandar Abbas high school principals, educational management innovations 2015; 38: 7-21. Persian
15. Heshmati MR, Kharakian A, Moharati Y. Improving participatory management in the university through the system of suggestions and justice by considering the status of participatory governance and justice in Islamic teachings, Management at Islamic University, 2014, 3(1): 71-94. Persian
16. Gharayi H, Bahrami MA, Hamidi Y, Askari R, Tapak L The Relationship between organizational climate and accountability in selected public, private and charity hospitals in Hamedan and Yazd 2013, 2012, 3(1,2): 35-47. Persian
17. Alidadiyani Sh. Assessment of the Impact of Participatory Management and Effectiveness on the Organizational Commitment of Bojnourd Education Staff, Psychology and Educational Studies 2016, 11(2): 170-177. Persian
18. ImaniBarandagh M, Bayat A, BahramBagheri Y. A Study on the Factors Affecting the Increasing Health of the Administrative System and Coping with Corruption, New Research in the Humanities 2016, 17(165-178). Persian
19. Hosni Shelmai M. The Impact of School Managers Participation in the Programs and Duties of Public-Private-Public-Participation, Education 2016. 126: 47-68. Persian